← 返回

RBM34 在骨肉瘤中的致癌和免疫学价值及其泛癌分析

英文原题:Oncogenic and immunological values of RBM34 in osteosarcoma and its pan-cancer analysis.

查看英文原题

Oncogenic and immunological values of RBM34 in osteosarcoma and its pan-cancer analysis.

PubMed 2023/11/15(内容时间) Am J Cancer Res Q2 · IF 3.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

RNA结合蛋白(RBPs)日益被认为是影响多种实体瘤进展、预后和免疫应答的潜在因素。然而,关于RBM34在肿瘤微环境中生物学机制的全面理解仍不完整,需要进一步开展系统性的泛癌研究,以确定其诊断、预后和免疫学意义。

本研究采用TCGA、CCLE、HPA、GTEX和TARGET数据库分析RBM34在多种肿瘤类型中的表达丰度和亚细胞定位。使用Kaplan-Meier生存分析研究RBM34对临床预后的影响。

我们采用TISIDB门户、CIBERSORT和ESTIMATE算法评估RBM34表达与泛癌和骨肉瘤中免疫调节因子、趋化因子和TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TILs)的相关性。应用CGP数据库评估靶向药物的半数抑制浓度,同时利用TMB、MSI和MMR预测肿瘤免疫治疗的疗效。

此外,构建了骨肉瘤患者的RBM34衍生预后指数(RDPI),并将其与结局和免疫状态相关联。最后,我们检测了RBM34敲低对骨肉瘤增殖和迁移能力的调控作用。

我们的结果表明,RBM34主要定位于细胞核,并在大多数人类癌症类型中差异表达。Kaplan-Meier曲线分析和Cox回归表明,RBM34表达影响多种肿瘤中的四项生存指标,包括总生存期(OS),并且是骨肉瘤的独立预后因素。在免疫学特征方面,RBM34 表达与泛癌免疫调节剂相关分子、淋巴细胞亚群浸润以及免疫治疗应答生物标志物显著相关。随后的体外实验提供了额外证据,表明抑制 RBM34 可阻碍骨肉瘤的迁移和侵袭能力。

此外,RDPI 的应用证明了其在预测患者结局和评估个体免疫景观方面的可靠性。在不同 RDPI 评分亚组中,观察到多种 TIL(包括初始 B 细胞、CD8+ T 细胞、静息树突状细胞和活化 CD4+ 记忆 T 细胞)以及癌相关成纤维细胞比例存在显著差异。

总体而言,RBM34 在多种癌症类型中表现出与临床预后、免疫浸润和免疫治疗的关联,也可能作为骨肉瘤的可行治疗靶点。

展开英文摘要原文

RNA binding proteins (RBPs) are increasingly recognized as potential factors influencing the advancement, prognostication, and immune response in various solid tumors. Nevertheless, the comprehensive understanding of RBM34's biological mechanisms within the tumor microenvironment remains incomplete, necessitating further systematic pan-cancer investigations to ascertain its diagnostic, prognostic, and immunological significance.

In this study, the TCGA, CCLE, HPA, GTEX, and TARGET databases were employed to analyze the expression abundance and subcellular localization of RBM34 in diverse tumor types. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to investigate the impact of RBM34 on clinical prognosis.

We implemented the TISIDB portal, CIBERSORT, and ESTIMATE algorithms to assess the correlation between RBM34 expression and immunomodulators, chemokines, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in both pan-cancer and osteosarcoma. The CGP database was applied to evaluate the half-maximal inhibitory concentrations of targeted drugs, while TMB, MSI, and MMR were utilized to predict the efficacy of tumor immunotherapy.

Furthermore, an RBM34-derived prognostic index (RDPI) was constructed for osteosarcoma patients and linked to outcomes and immune status.

Finally, we examined the modulation of RBM34 knockdown on osteosarcoma proliferation and migration capacity.

Our results indicate that RBM34 was predominantly localized in the nucleus and differentially expressed in most human cancer types. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and Cox regression demonstrated that RBM34 expression affected four survival metrics including overall survival (OS) in multiple tumors and was an independent prognostic factor for osteosarcoma.

In immunological characterization, RBM34 expression was significantly associated with pan-cancer immunomodulator-related molecules, lymphocyte subpopulation infiltration, and biomarkers of immunotherapy response. Subsequent in vitro experiments provided additional evidence that the suppression of RBM34 impeded the migratory and invasive capabilities of osteosarcoma.

Moreover, the utilization of RDPI demonstrated its reliability in prognosticating patient outcomes and estimating the individual immune landscape. Marked differences in multiple TILs (including naive B cells, CD8+ T cells, resting dendritic cells, and activated CD4+ memory T cells) and cancer-associated fibroblast proportion were observed in diverse RDPI score subgroups.

Generally, RBM34 exhibited associations with clinical prognosis, immune infiltration, and immunotherapy across various cancer types, and may also serve as a viable therapeutic target for osteosarcoma.

论文信息

作者
Zhang W、He R、Cao W、Li D、Zheng Q、Zhang Y
单位
Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University Zhenjiang 212000, Jiangsu, China.China
期刊
American journal of cancer research2023
原文标识
PubMed 38058813