← 返回

脉冲电场消融与射频热消融在小鼠乳腺癌模型中的比较:抗癌免疫刺激、肿瘤反应和远隔效应

英文原题:Pulsed Electric Field Ablation versus Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation in Murine Breast Cancer Models: Anticancer Immune Stimulation, Tumor Response, and Abscopal Effects.

查看英文原题

Pulsed Electric Field Ablation versus Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation in Murine Breast Cancer Models: Anticancer Immune Stimulation, Tumor Response, and Abscopal Effects.

PubMed 2023/11/30(内容时间) J Vasc Interv Radiol Q2 · IF 3.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

本研究使用的专有形式 PEF 在小鼠中诱发了优于 RF 消融热消融的优先免疫刺激特征,这为增强免疫检查点抑制疗法对免疫治疗无应答肿瘤的治疗效果提供了启示。

研究思路结论见上方概要

比较在鼠肿瘤中,大小匹配的射频(RF)消融与一种专有形式的脉冲电场(PEF)消融后的免疫反应和生存。

原位接种的EMT6或4T1小鼠肿瘤接受假处理、RF消融或PEF消融。4T1肿瘤消融包括腹腔内检查点抑制免疫治疗(αPD-1)亚组。采集血液用于细胞因子谱分析和流式细胞术。测量肿瘤大小并监测生存期。肿瘤样本经处理用于组织学、免疫组织化学、流式细胞术和细胞因子谱分析。从4T1荷瘤小鼠采集肺组织进行苏木精-伊红组织学检查,以评估转移扩散和消融诱导的远隔效应。

PEF 引发了不同的免疫调节效应,与 RF 消融相比,血清和肿瘤细胞因子谱存在明显差异,包括瘤内血管内皮生长因子、缺氧诱导因子 1α、c-MET、白细胞介素-10、Ki67 和肿瘤坏死因子-α 的下调(均 P < .05)。PEF 增强了固有免疫激活,表现为树突状细胞、M1 巨噬细胞和NK 细胞的募集增强,同时 M2 巨噬细胞和髓源性抑制细胞减少(均 P < .05)。同时,与 RF 消融相比,PEF 增强了适应性免疫,其特征是抗原特异性 T 细胞增加和调节性 T 细胞减少(均 P < .05)。PEF 抑制了肿瘤生长,并在研究结束时提高了生存率(≥4× 对比 RFA)。最后,PEF 促进了清除肺部转移灶的远隔效应,与 αPD-1 联合使用时比单用 PEF 更强。

展开英文摘要原文

To compare the immune response and survival after size-matched radiofrequency (RF) ablation and a proprietary form of pulsed electric field (PEF) ablation in murine tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Orthotopically inoculated EMT6 or 4T1 murine tumors received sham, RF ablation, or PEF ablation. 4T1 tumor ablations included subgroups with intraperitoneal checkpoint inhibition immunotherapy (αPD-1). Blood was collected for cytokine profiling and flow cytometry. Tumor size was measured and survival was monitored. Tumor samples were processed for histology, immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and cytokine profiling. Lungs were collected from 4T1-bearing mice for hematoxylin and eosin histology to assess metastatic spread and abscopal effect induced by ablation.

PEF elicited distinct immunomodulatory effects, with clear differences in serum and tumor cytokine profiles compared with RF ablation, including intratumoral downregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α, c-MET, interleukin-10, Ki67, and tumor necrosis factor-α (all P < .05). PEF increased innate immune activation, with enhanced recruitment of dendritic cells, M1 macrophages, and natural killer cells coupled with a reduction in M2 macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (all P < .05). Concurrently, PEF strengthened adaptive immunity compared with RF ablation, characterized by increased antigen-specific T cells and decreased regulatory T cells (all P < .05). PEF stalled tumor growth and increased survival at the end of the study (≥4× versus RFA). Finally, PEF promoted an abscopal effect of clearing metastases in the lungs, which was stronger in combination with αPD-1 than with PEF alone.

The proprietary form of PEF used in this study evoked a preferential immunostimulatory profile versus RF ablation thermal ablation in mice, with implications for enhancing the therapeutic effectiveness of checkpoint inhibition immunotherapy for immunotherapy-unresponsive tumors.

论文信息

作者
Pastori C、Nafie EHO、Wagh MS、Mammarappallil JG、Neal RE 2nd
第一作者单位
Department of Research, Galvanize Therapeutics, Redwood City, California.United States
通讯作者单位
Department of Research, Galvanize Therapeutics, Redwood City, California. Electronic address: Bob@galvanizetx.com.United States
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR2024 Mar
原文标识
PubMed 38042523 · DOI 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.11.021