CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Case report: Deep molecular remissions post two separate CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies do not prevent disease from relapsing in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Case report: Deep molecular remissions post two separate CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies do not prevent disease from relapsing in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
费城染色体阳性急性淋巴细胞白血病(Ph+ ALL)是一种侵袭性B细胞恶性肿瘤。复发性Ph+ ALL患者的治疗十分困难。目前通常采用异基因干细胞移植(allo-SCT)或靶向CD19的CAR-T 细胞作为挽救治疗,但关于患者同时接受allo-SCT及多次CAR-T 治疗的病例报道很少,最佳管理方案尚不明确。本文报告一名复发男性Ph+ ALL患者,首次接受自体CAR-T 挽救治疗,随后进行allo-SCT。不幸的是,尽管首次CAR-T 和allo-SCT后达到完全分子缓解(CMR),患者仍发生第二次复发。随后,患者接受供者来源的第二种CAR-T 产品挽救治疗并成功缓解。
然而,第二次CAR-T 治疗再次达到CMR并接受预防性供者淋巴细胞输注后,患者仍发生分子复发;之后采用泊纳替尼挽救治疗。患者经泊纳替尼治疗达到CMR,末次随访时仍处于缓解状态。整个病程中均未检测到ABL激酶突变。该病例提示,既往接受CAR-T 和allo-SCT的复发Ph+ ALL患者再次接受CD19靶向CAR-T 治疗是可行且可能有效的,即使两次CAR-T 构型相同。但即便每次CAR-T 和allo-SCT后均达到深度缓解,仍可能有极少量无法检测的白血病细胞残留。第二次CAR-T 治疗后获得深度应答的Ph+ ALL患者如何优化管理,仍需进一步探索。
Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) is an aggressive B-cell malignancy. The management of a relapsed Ph+ ALL patient is challenging. Currently, either allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) or CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) are usually employed as salvage modalities for a relapsed patient.
However, there are few reports concerning cases that had both allo-SCT and multiple CAR T-cell therapies, and the optimal management of such patients is unclear.
Here, we report a relapsed Ph+ ALL male who was first salvaged with autologous CAR T-cell therapy, followed by allo-SCT. Unfortunately, he had a second relapse even with complete molecular remission (CMR) response after the first CAR T and allo-SCT. This patient was then successfully salvaged by a second CAR T-cell product that is donor-derived.
However, even with a CMR response once again following the second CAR T-cell therapy and prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion, he experienced a molecular relapse; ponatinib was employed as the subsequent salvage treatment. He achieved a CMR response following ponatinib and was still in remission at the last follow-up.
No ABL kinase mutation was detected during the whole course of the disease. This case indicated that a repeated CD19-targeted CAR T-cell treatment is feasible and may be effective in a relapsed Ph+ ALL patient that had previous CAR T-cell and allo-SCT, even though both CAR T-cell have the same construction.
However, even with a deep response after each CAR T-cell therapy and allo-SCT, there is still a very small amount of undetectable leukemic cells. The optimal management of Ph+ ALL patients who have a deep response after a second CAR T-cell therapy deserves further exploration.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。