← 返回

病例报告:费城染色体阳性急性淋巴细胞白血病中两次独立的 CD19 靶向 CAR-T 细胞治疗后的深度分子学缓解未能阻止疾病复发

英文原题:Case report: Deep molecular remissions post two separate CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies do not prevent disease from relapsing in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

查看英文原题

Case report: Deep molecular remissions post two separate CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies do not prevent disease from relapsing in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

PubMed 2023/11/03(内容时间) Front Oncol Q2 · IF 3.4(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

费城染色体阳性急性淋巴细胞白血病(Ph+ ALL)是一种侵袭性B细胞恶性肿瘤。复发性Ph+ ALL患者的治疗十分困难。目前通常采用异基因干细胞移植(allo-SCT)或靶向CD19的CAR-T 细胞作为挽救治疗,但关于患者同时接受allo-SCT及多次CAR-T 治疗的病例报道很少,最佳管理方案尚不明确。本文报告一名复发男性Ph+ ALL患者,首次接受自体CAR-T 挽救治疗,随后进行allo-SCT。不幸的是,尽管首次CAR-T 和allo-SCT后达到完全分子缓解(CMR),患者仍发生第二次复发。随后,患者接受供者来源的第二种CAR-T 产品挽救治疗并成功缓解。

然而,第二次CAR-T 治疗再次达到CMR并接受预防性供者淋巴细胞输注后,患者仍发生分子复发;之后采用泊纳替尼挽救治疗。患者经泊纳替尼治疗达到CMR,末次随访时仍处于缓解状态。整个病程中均未检测到ABL激酶突变。该病例提示,既往接受CAR-T 和allo-SCT的复发Ph+ ALL患者再次接受CD19靶向CAR-T 治疗是可行且可能有效的,即使两次CAR-T 构型相同。但即便每次CAR-T 和allo-SCT后均达到深度缓解,仍可能有极少量无法检测的白血病细胞残留。第二次CAR-T 治疗后获得深度应答的Ph+ ALL患者如何优化管理,仍需进一步探索。

展开英文摘要原文

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) is an aggressive B-cell malignancy. The management of a relapsed Ph+ ALL patient is challenging. Currently, either allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) or CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) are usually employed as salvage modalities for a relapsed patient.

However, there are few reports concerning cases that had both allo-SCT and multiple CAR T-cell therapies, and the optimal management of such patients is unclear.

Here, we report a relapsed Ph+ ALL male who was first salvaged with autologous CAR T-cell therapy, followed by allo-SCT. Unfortunately, he had a second relapse even with complete molecular remission (CMR) response after the first CAR T and allo-SCT. This patient was then successfully salvaged by a second CAR T-cell product that is donor-derived.

However, even with a CMR response once again following the second CAR T-cell therapy and prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion, he experienced a molecular relapse; ponatinib was employed as the subsequent salvage treatment. He achieved a CMR response following ponatinib and was still in remission at the last follow-up.

No ABL kinase mutation was detected during the whole course of the disease. This case indicated that a repeated CD19-targeted CAR T-cell treatment is feasible and may be effective in a relapsed Ph+ ALL patient that had previous CAR T-cell and allo-SCT, even though both CAR T-cell have the same construction.

However, even with a deep response after each CAR T-cell therapy and allo-SCT, there is still a very small amount of undetectable leukemic cells. The optimal management of Ph+ ALL patients who have a deep response after a second CAR T-cell therapy deserves further exploration.

论文信息

作者
Tang Y、Fei X、Yu X、Cao J、Wang L、Lei F
第一作者单位
Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhengjiang, Jiangsu, China.China
通讯作者单位
Department of Hematology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhengjiang, Jiangsu, China.China
文献类型
病例报告
期刊
Frontiers in oncology2023
原文标识
PubMed 38023231 · DOI 10.3389/fonc.2023.1251738