CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Clinical Trials on Cellular Therapy for Children and Adolescents With Cancer: A 15-Year Trend in the United States.
Clinical Trials on Cellular Therapy for Children and Adolescents With Cancer: A 15-Year Trend in the United States.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
美国针对儿童/青少年和年轻成人(AYA)癌症患者招募的细胞治疗试验启动频率随时间增加。大多数研究为 1 期或 2 期、仅单中心、且无行业支持。未来儿童癌症细胞治疗的机会应包括多中心方法。
细胞疗法常在针对患有恶性疾病的儿科患者的临床试验中进行研究。美国涉及儿童和青少年的正在进行和已完成的细胞疗法临床试验的特征此前尚未有报道。
我们在ClinicalTrials.gov上检索了涉及细胞疗法、且在美国招募18岁以下患者的临床试验。试验最初被分为仅儿童组(最大合格年龄<18岁)、儿童/青少年和年轻成人(AYA)组(最大合格年龄≤21岁)以及儿童/成人组(最大合格年龄>21岁)。分析了描述性特征及随时间变化的趋势。
我们纳入了2007-2022年间发布的202项试验。在这202项试验中,仅有3项为儿童专属试验;因此,我们后续分析聚焦于比较儿童/AYA(≤21岁)与儿童/成人试验(>21岁)。169项(84%)同时入组儿童和成人人群。绝大多数试验为早期阶段(1期、1/2期和2期,198/202,98%)。CAR-T 细胞疗法研究最为常见(88/202,44%),而NK 细胞疗法在儿童/AYA试验中最为常见(42% vs. 16%)。大多数试验仅限单一机构(130/202,64%)且未获得产业资助(163/202,81%)。获得产业资助的研究更可能为多中心(64% vs. 29%)和国际性(31% vs. 0.6%)。值得注意的是,没有中枢神经系统肿瘤专属试验获得产业资助。基于资助来源,治疗类型无差异。在研究时间段内,每年新启动试验数量有所增加(p=0.01)。
We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for clinical trials involving cellular therapies enrolling patients under 18 years of age in the U.S. Trials were initially stratified into child-only (maximum age of eligibility <18 years), child/adolescent and young adult (AYA) (maximum age of eligibility ≤21 years), and child/adult (maximum age of eligibility >21 years). Descriptive characteristics and trends over time were analyzed.
We included 202 trials posted 2007-2022. Of the 202 trials, only three trials were child-only; thus, our subsequent analysis focused on comparing child/AYA (≤21 years) and child/adult trials (>21 years). One hundred sixty-nine (84%) enrolled both child and adult populations. The vast majority of trials were early phase (phase 1, 1/2, and 2, 198/202, 98%). Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies were most commonly studied (88/202, 44%), while natural-killer cell therapies were most common in child/AYA trials (42% vs. 16%). Most trials were single institution-only (130/202, 64%) and did not receive industry funding (163/202, 81%). Studies with industry funding were more likely to be multicenter (64% vs. 29%) and international (31% vs. 0.6%). Notably, no central nervous system tumor-specific trials had industry funding. There was no difference in therapy type based on funding source. Yearly new trial activations increased over the time period studied (p=0.01).
The frequency of cellular therapy trial activations enrolling child/AYA patients with cancer in the U.S. has increased over time. Most studies were phase 1 or 2, single institution-only, and not industry-supported. Future opportunities for cell therapy for pediatric cancer should include multi-institutional approaches.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。