← 返回

接受 CAR-T 细胞治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者临床结局的种族与族裔差异

英文原题:Racial and ethnic differences in clinical outcomes among patients with multiple myeloma treated with CAR T-cell therapy.

查看英文原题

Racial and ethnic differences in clinical outcomes among patients with multiple myeloma treated with CAR T-cell therapy.

PubMed 2024/01/09(内容时间) Blood Adv Q1 · IF 7.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

伊德基奥仑赛(ide-cel)是首个获美国食品药品监督管理局批准用于复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)患者的CAR-T 细胞疗法。标准治疗(SOC)ide-cel在种族和族裔多样人群中的临床结局研究不足。

本研究汇总来自11家机构接受SOC ide-cel治疗的207例RRMM患者数据(28%属于种族或族裔少数群体),评估不同种族和族裔在毒性及不良事件发生率、ide-cel应答和生存方面的差异。患者包括西班牙裔22例(11%)、非西班牙裔黑人36例(17%)及非西班牙裔白人149例(72%)。与西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白人相比,非西班牙裔黑人患者C反应蛋白中位水平更高(分别为1.0、0.8和3.5 mg/dL;P=0.02),基线铁蛋白也较高(分别为362.0、307.0和680.5;P=0.08),且更常发生细胞因子释放综合征(分别为77%、85%和97%;P=0.04)。西班牙裔患者最佳总缓解率较低(59%),低于非西班牙裔黑人和白人患者(均为86%;P=0.01),但不同种族和族裔患者的无进展生存期或总生存期没有差异。据作者所知,这是首个也是规模最大的按种族和族裔评估SOC ide-cel临床结局的研究。尽管不同群体在安全性和ide-cel应答方面存在差异,结果仍支持在所有RRMM患者中应用ide-cel。仍需在规模更大、更多样化的RRMM人群及更长随访中验证这些发现。

展开英文摘要原文

Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) was the first chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy to gain US Food and Drug Administration approval for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The clinical outcomes of standard of care (SOC) ide-cel in racially and ethnically diverse populations have been understudied.

This study pooled data from 207 patients with RRMM (28% patients of racial and ethnic minority groups) treated with SOC ide-cel across 11 institutions to examine racial and ethnic differences in the incidence of toxicities and adverse events, response to ide-cel, and survival.

This study included 22 (11%) Hispanic, 36 (17%) non-Hispanic Black, and 149 (72%) non-Hispanic White patients with RRMM. Compared with Hispanic and non-Hispanic White patients, non-Hispanic Black patients had higher median levels of C-reactive protein (1. 0, 0. 8, and 3. 5 mg/dL, respectively; P = . 02) and baseline ferritin (362. 0 vs 307. 0 vs 680.

5, respectively; P = . 08) and were more likely to develop cytokine release syndrome (77%, 85%, and 97%, respectively; P = . 04). Although best overall response rate was lower among Hispanic patients (59%) than among non-Hispanic Black (86%) and White patients (86%; P = . 01), there were no racial and ethnic differences in progression-free or overall survival.

We provide, to our knowledge, the first and largest investigation of clinical outcomes of SOC ide-cel by race and ethnicity. Despite differences in safety and response to ide-cel, our findings encourage the use of ide-cel in all patients with RRMM.

These findings should be confirmed in larger samples of diverse patients with RRMM, with longer follow-up time.

论文信息

作者
Peres LC、Oswald LB、Dillard CM、De Avila G、Nishihori T、Blue BJ、Freeman CL、Locke FL
第一作者单位
Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.United States
通讯作者单位
Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.United States
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究 · 美国 NIH 资助研究
期刊
Blood advances2024 Jan 9
原文标识
PubMed 37855718 · DOI 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010894