← 返回

靶向 B 细胞成熟抗原的第五代 CAR-T 细胞在多发性骨髓瘤中增强抗肿瘤疗效、增殖能力并缓解 T 细胞耗竭

英文原题:Enhanced antitumor efficacy, proliferative capacity, and alleviation of T cell exhaustion by fifth-generation chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting B cell maturation antigen in multiple myeloma.

查看英文原题

Enhanced antitumor efficacy, proliferative capacity, and alleviation of T cell exhaustion by fifth-generation chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting B cell maturation antigen in multiple myeloma.

PubMed 2023/10/14(内容时间) Biomed Pharmacother

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

靶向B细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)的嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法已获批用于多发性骨髓瘤(MM)。部分临床研究报告疗效不理想,包括CAR-T 细胞细胞毒性下降,以及程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达升高导致肿瘤逃逸。为提高CAR-T 效率并克服PD-L1介导的T细胞抑制,研究人员开发了抗BCMA-CAR5-T细胞,其具有三个共刺激结构域,并可分泌抗PD-L1单链可变片段(scFv)阻断分子。抗BCMA-CAR4-T细胞包含全人源抗BCMA scFv,以及与CD3相连的三个胞内结构域(CD28、4-1BB和CD27);抗BCMA-CAR5-T则通过将抗PD-L1 scFv融合至抗BCMA-CAR4构建。抗BCMA-CAR4-T和抗BCMA-CAR5-T对亲本MM细胞的抗肿瘤活性相当。

但在效应细胞与靶细胞比为1:2时,只有抗BCMA-CAR5-T可持续杀伤PD-L1高表达MM细胞,抗BCMA-CAR4-T则不能。BCMA阳性靶细胞可特异性激活抗BCMA-CAR5-T,增强CAR-T 增殖、细胞毒介质和促炎细胞因子释放。该细胞对BCMA阳性靶细胞具有特异性细胞毒作用,可减少靶细胞数量、增加CAR-T 细胞数量,并在抗原再次刺激期间维持CAR表达。有趣的是,只有抗BCMA-CAR5-T细胞的PD-1受体水平下降,且与靶细胞PD-L1表达减少相关。研究成功制备了可分泌抗PD-L1 scFv的抗BCMA-CAR5-T,其对MM细胞的抗肿瘤效力和增殖能力更强,T细胞耗竭也有所缓解。仍需在离体和临床研究中进一步评估其抗肿瘤疗效。

展开英文摘要原文

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) has been approved for treating multiple myeloma (MM). Some clinical studies reported suboptimal outcomes, including reduced cytotoxicity of CAR-T cells and tumor evasion through increased expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). To enhance CAR-T cell efficiency and overcome PD-L1-mediated T cell suppression, we developed anti-BCMA-CAR5-T cells equipped with three costimulatory domains and the ability to secrete anti-PD-L1 single-chain variable fragment (scFv) blockade molecules.

Anti-BCMA-CAR4-T cells contained a fully human anti-BCMA scFv and three intracellular domains (CD28, 4-1BB, and CD27) joined with CD3 . Anti-BCMA-CAR5-T cells were generated by fusing anti-BCMA-CAR4 with anti-PD-L1 scFv. Both anti-BCMA-CAR4-T and anti-BCMA-CAR5-T cells demonstrated comparable antitumor activity against parental MM cells.

However, at an effector-to-target ratio of 1:2, only anti-BCMA-CAR5-T cells maintained cytolytic activity against PD-L1 high MM cells, unlike anti-BCMA-CAR4 T cells. Anti-BCMA-CAR5-T cells were specifically activated by BCMA-expressing target cells, resulting in increased CAR-T cell proliferation, release of cytolytic mediators, and pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Anti-BCMA-CAR5-T cells demonstrated specific cytotoxicity against BCMA-expressing target cells, leading to decreased target cell numbers, increased CAR-T cell numbers, and preserved CAR expression during antigenic re-stimulation. Interestingly, only anti-BCMA-CAR5-T cells showed reduced PD-1 receptor levels, which correlated with decreased PD-L1 expression on target cells.

We successfully generated anti-BCMA-CAR5-T cells capable of secreting anti-PD-L1 scFv. These cells exhibited superior antitumor efficiency, proliferative capacity, and alleviated T-cell exhaustion against MM cells.

Further investigation into the antitumor efficacy of anti-BCMA-CAR5-T cells is warranted in ex vivo and clinical research settings.

论文信息

作者
Yuti P、Sawasdee N、Natungnuy K、Rujirachaivej P、Luangwattananun P、Sujjitjoon J、Yenchitsomanus PT
第一作者单位
Siriraj Center of Research Excellence for Cancer Immunotherapy (SiCORE-CIT), Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Division of Molecular Medicine, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.Thailand
通讯作者单位
Siriraj Center of Research Excellence for Cancer Immunotherapy (SiCORE-CIT), Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Division of Molecular Medicine, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Electronic address: pathai.yen@mahidol.ac.th.Thailand
期刊
Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie2023 Dec
原文标识
PubMed 37844355 · DOI 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115691