← 返回

多发性骨髓瘤患者既往接受 BCMA 靶向治疗后使用 ide-cel 的真实世界经验

英文原题:Real-world experience of patients with multiple myeloma receiving ide-cel after a prior BCMA-targeted therapy.

查看英文原题

Real-world experience of patients with multiple myeloma receiving ide-cel after a prior BCMA-targeted therapy.

PubMed 2023/08/09(内容时间) Blood Cancer J Q1 · IF 13.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

大多数多发性骨髓瘤患者在接受 BCMA 靶向治疗(BCMA-TT)后会出现疾病复发,而描述接受序贯 BCMA-TT 治疗患者结局的数据有限。

我们分析了在美国 11 个医疗中心输注标准治疗 idecabtagene vicleucel(一种抗 BCMA 嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞疗法)的患者的临床结局。共有 50 例既往接受过 BCMA-TT 暴露的患者(38 例抗体药物偶联物,7 例双特异性抗体,5 例 CAR-T)和 153 例既往未接受过 BCMA-TT 的患者接受了 ide-cel 输注,中位随访时间分别为 4.5 个月和 6.0 个月。两队列之间的安全性结局相当。与既往未接受过 BCMA-TT 的队列相比,既往 BCMA-TT 队列的总缓解率更低(74% 对 88%;p = 0.021)、中位缓解持续时间更短(7.4 对 9.6 个月;p = 0.03)、中位无进展生存期更短(3.2 个月对 9.0 个月;p = 0.0002)。所有 5 例既往接受过抗 BCMA CAR-T 的患者均对 ide-cel 产生缓解,且该亚组的生存结局最佳。

总之,对于既往暴露于 BCMA-TT 的真实世界患者,ide-cel 治疗产生了有意义的临床缓解,但与既往未接受过 BCMA-TT 治疗的患者相比,缓解率和持久性欠佳。

展开英文摘要原文

Most patients with multiple myeloma experience disease relapse after treatment with a B-cell maturation antigen-targeted therapy (BCMA-TT), and data describing outcomes for patients treated with sequential BCMA-TT are limited.

We analyzed clinical outcomes for patients infused with standard-of-care idecabtagene vicleucel, an anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, at 11 US medical centers. A total of 50 patients with prior BCMA-TT exposure (38 antibody-drug conjugate, 7 bispecific, 5 CAR T) and 153 patients with no prior BCMA-TT were infused with ide-cel, with a median follow-up duration of 4. 5 and 6. 0 months, respectively.

Safety outcomes between cohorts were comparable. The prior BCMA-TT cohort had a lower overall response rate (74% versus 88%; p = 0. 021), median duration of response (7. 4 versus 9. 6 months; p = 0. 03), and median progression-free survival (3. 2 months versus 9. 0 months; p = 0. 0002) compared to the cohort without prior BCMA-TT. All five patients who received a prior anti-BCMA CAR T responded to ide-cel, and survival outcomes were best for this subgroup.

In conclusion, treatment with ide-cel yielded meaningful clinical responses in real-world patients exposed to a prior BCMA-TT, though response rates and durability were suboptimal compared to those not treated with a prior BCMA-TT.

论文信息

作者
Ferreri CJ、Hildebrandt MAT、Hashmi H、Shune LO、McGuirk JP、Sborov DW、Wagner CB、Kocoglu MH
第一作者单位
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. KPatel1@mdanderson.org.United States
文献类型
多中心研究 · 观察性研究 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Blood cancer journal2023 Aug 9
原文标识
PubMed 37558706 · DOI 10.1038/s41408-023-00886-8