CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:A Predictive Model of Severe Cytokine Release Syndrome After Coadministration of CD19- and CD22-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Children With B-Cell Hematological Malignancies Based on Patient-Reported Outcomes.
A Predictive Model of Severe Cytokine Release Syndrome After Coadministration of CD19- and CD22-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Children With B-Cell Hematological Malignancies Based on Patient-Reported Outcomes.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
所构建的列线图模型具有良好的区分度和校准度,为识别 sCRS 提供了更便捷、直观的评估工具。
CAR-T 细胞治疗相关的重度细胞因子释放综合征(sCRS)已严重影响患者生命安全。
探讨B细胞血液系统恶性肿瘤患儿发生sCRS的影响因素,并建立风险预测模型。
研究招募115例接受CD19和CD22靶向CAR-T 细胞治疗的B细胞血液系统恶性肿瘤患儿。根据有症状的不良事件和易于获取的临床变量建立列线图模型。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积评估模型区分度,采用校准曲线和Hosmer-Lemeshow检验评估模型校准度,并采用Bootstrap自助抽样法进行内部验证。
37%的患儿发生sCRS。列线图纳入的指标包括治疗前肿瘤负荷、预处理前血小板减少,以及全身肌无力和头痛评分的平均值。受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.841;校准曲线显示,列线图预测的sCRS概率与实际发生概率吻合良好。Hosmer-Lemeshow检验表明模型拟合良好(χ²=5.759,P=.674)。内部验证得到的一致性指数(C指数)为0.841(0.770–0.912)。
建立的列线图模型具有良好的区分度和校准度,可作为识别sCRS的便捷、直观评估工具。 实践意义:将患者报告结局纳入风险预测模型,有助于早期识别sCRS。
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy-related severe cytokine release syndrome (sCRS) has seriously affected the life safety of patients.
To explore the influencing factors of sCRS in children with B-cell hematological malignancies and build a risk prediction model.
The study recruited 115 children with B-cell hematological malignancies who received CD19- and CD22-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. A nomogram model was established based on symptomatic adverse events and highly accessible clinical variables. The model discrimination was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The calibration of our model was evaluated by the calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. The bootstrap self-sampling method was used to internally validate.
Thirty-seven percent of the children experienced sCRS. Indicators included in the nomogram were tumor burden before treatment, thrombocytopenia before pretreatment, and the mean value of generalized muscle weakness and headache scores. The results showed that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.841, and the calibration curve showed that the probability of sCRS predicted by the nomogram was in good agreement with the actual probability of sCRS. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated that the model fit the data well ( χ2 = 5.759, P = .674). The concordance index (C-index) obtained by internal validation was 0.841 (0.770, 0.912).
The nomogram model constructed has a good degree of discrimination and calibration, which provides a more convenient and visual evaluation tool for identifying the sCRS. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Incorporation of patient-reported outcomes into risk prediction models enables early identification of sCRS.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。