← 返回

用于表征 CAR-T 细胞动力学的生物分析方法:PCR 检测与基质比较

英文原题:Bioanalytical Methods for Characterization of CAR-T Cellular Kinetics: Comparison of PCR Assays and Matrices.

查看英文原题

Bioanalytical Methods for Characterization of CAR-T Cellular Kinetics: Comparison of PCR Assays and Matrices.

PubMed 2023/08/09(内容时间) Clin Pharmacol Ther Q1 · IF 4.9(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

近年来,多种基于CAR-T 细胞的疗法已获批用于治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤,靶向 CD19 和 B 细胞成熟抗原。与蛋白质或抗体疗法不同,CAR-T 疗法是“活细胞”疗法,其药代动力学特征表现为扩增、分布、收缩和持续存在。

因此,与大多数生物制剂所采用的常规配体结合试验相比,这种独特的治疗模式需要不同的定量方法。可采用细胞学(流式细胞术)或分子学检测(聚合酶链反应(PCR)),每种方法各有独特的优势和劣势。在本文中,我们描述了所使用的分子检测方法:定量 PCR(qPCR),这是最初用于估计转基因拷贝数的平台;以及更近期的微滴数字 PCR(ddPCR),其可定量 CAR 转基因的绝对拷贝数。

我们还对两种方法在患者样本中的可比性,以及每种方法在不同基质(分离的 CD3 + T 细胞或全血)中的可比性进行了评估。

结果表明,在一项 CAR-T 疗法试验的临床样本中,qPCR 和 ddPCR 在扩增同一基因方面具有良好的相关性。此外,我们的研究表明,基于 qPCR 的转基因水平扩增与 DNA 来源(CD3 + T 细胞或全血)无关,且相关性良好。

我们的结果还强调,ddPCR 可能是监测 CAR-T 给药早期扩增前阶段样本以及长期监测期间样本的更好平台,因为除了更易于实施和样本物流管理外,它们还能以高灵敏度检测拷贝数极低的样本。

展开英文摘要原文

Recently, multiple chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T)-based therapies have been approved for treating hematological malignancies, targeting CD19 and B-cell maturation antigen. Unlike protein or antibody therapies, CAR-T therapies are "living cell" therapies whose pharmacokinetics are characterized by expansion, distribution, contraction, and persistence.

Therefore, this unique modality requires a different approach for quantitation compared with conventional ligand binding assays implemented for most biologics. Cellular (flow cytometry) or molecular assays (polymerase chain reaction (PCR)) can be deployed with each having unique advantages and disadvantages.

In this article, we describe the molecular assays utilized: quantitative PCR (qPCR), which was the initial platform used to estimate transgene copy numbers and more recently droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) which quantitates the absolute copy numbers of CAR transgene.

The comparability of the two methods in patient samples and of each method across different matrices (isolated CD3 + T-cells or whole blood) was also performed. The results show a good correlation between qPCR and ddPCR for the amplification of same gene in clinical samples from a CAR-T therapy trial.

In addition, our studies show that the qPCR-based amplification of transgene levels was well-correlated, independent of DNA sources (either CD3 + T-cells or whole blood).

Our results also highlight that ddPCR can be a better platform for monitoring samples at the early phase of CAR-T dosing prior to expansion and during long-term monitoring as they can detect samples with very low copy numbers with high sensitivity, in addition to easier implementation and sample logistics.

论文信息

作者
Masilamani M、Jawa V、Dai Y、Das R、Park A、Lamba M、Wu F、Zheng X
单位
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacometrics, Disposition, and Bioanalysis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, New Jersey, USA.United States
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics2023 Sep
原文标识
PubMed 37422675 · DOI 10.1002/cpt.2991