← 返回

APRIL CAR 在多发性骨髓瘤患者中疗效有限提示天然配体用于 CAR-T 细胞治疗的挑战

英文原题:Limited efficacy of APRIL CAR in patients with multiple myeloma indicate challenges in the use of natural ligands for CAR T-cell therapy.

查看英文原题

Limited efficacy of APRIL CAR in patients with multiple myeloma indicate challenges in the use of natural ligands for CAR T-cell therapy.

PubMed 2023/06/01(内容时间) J Immunother Cancer Q1 · IF 11.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

APRIL CAR 耐受性良好,但 AUTO2 中观察到的临床反应令人失望。随后,在将 APRIL CAR 与其他 BCMA CAR 进行比较时,我们观察到由于细胞表达配体与靶点结合减少而导致的体外功能缺陷。

研究思路结论见上方概要

我们使用增殖诱导配体(APRIL)构建了一种基于配体的第三代嵌合抗原受体(CAR),能够靶向两种骨髓瘤抗原:B细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)和跨膜激活剂及CAML相互作用分子。

APRIL CAR在复发难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者中进行了1期临床试验(NCT03287804,AUTO2)评估。11例患者接受了13剂治疗,首剂为15×10^6 CARs,后续患者按3+3剂量递增设计分别接受75、225、600和900×10^6 CARs。

APRIL CAR耐受性良好。5例(45.5%)患者发生1级细胞因子释放综合征,未出现神经毒性。然而,仅在45.5%的患者中观察到缓解(1例非常好的部分缓解,3例部分缓解,1例微小缓解)。为探索缓解不佳的机制基础,我们随后在一系列体外实验中比较了APRIL CAR与另外两种BCMA CAR,观察到无论采用何种转导方法或共刺激结构域,APRIL CAR的白细胞介素-2分泌均减少,且缺乏持续的肿瘤控制。APRIL CAR的干扰素信号传导也受损,且无自身激活的证据。因此,我们聚焦于APRIL本身,证实其与BCMA的亲和力及蛋白稳定性与BCMA CAR结合剂相似,但细胞表达的APRIL与可溶性BCMA的结合减少,对肿瘤细胞的亲合力降低。这表明膜结合型APRIL的折叠或稳定性欠佳,从而减弱了CAR激活。

展开英文摘要原文

We used a proliferating ligand (APRIL) to construct a ligand-based third generation chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) able to target two myeloma antigens, B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and transmembrane activator and CAML interactor.

The APRIL CAR was evaluated in a Phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03287804, AUTO2) in patients with relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma. Eleven patients received 13 doses, the first 15 10 6 CARs, and subsequent patients received 75,225,600 and 900 10 6 CARs in a 3+3 escalation design.

The APRIL CAR was well tolerated. Five (45.5%) patients developed Grade 1 cytokine release syndrome and there was no neurotoxicity. However, responses were only observed in 45.5% patients (1 very good partial response, 3 partial response, 1 minimal response). Exploring the mechanistic basis for poor responses, we then compared the APRIL CAR to two other BCMA CARs in a series of in vitro assays, observing reduced interleukin-2 secretion and lack of sustained tumor control by APRIL CAR regardless of transduction method or co-stimulatory domain. There was also impaired interferon signaling of APRIL CAR and no evidence of autoactivation. Thus focusing on APRIL itself, we confirmed similar affinity to BCMA and protein stability in comparison to BCMA CAR binders but reduced binding by cell-expressed APRIL to soluble BCMA and reduced avidity to tumor cells. This indicated either suboptimal folding or stability of membrane-bound APRIL attenuating CAR activation.

The APRIL CAR was well tolerated, but the clinical responses observed in AUTO2 were disappointing. Subsequently, when comparing the APRIL CAR to other BCMA CARs, we observed in vitro functional deficiencies due to reduced target binding by cell-expressed ligand.

论文信息

作者
Lee L、Lim WC、Galas-Filipowicz D、Fung K、Taylor J、Patel D、Akbar Z、Alvarez Mediavilla E
第一作者单位
Research Department of Haematology, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK.United Kingdom
通讯作者单位
Research Department of Haematology, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK m.pule@ucl.ac.uk.United Kingdom
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer2023 Jun
原文标识
PubMed 37399355 · DOI 10.1136/jitc-2023-006699