← 返回

CAR-T 细胞用于 CAR-T 治疗失败后的挽救治疗

英文原题:Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells as Salvage Therapy for Post-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Failure.

查看英文原题

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells as Salvage Therapy for Post-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Failure.

PubMed 2023/06/30(内容时间) Transplant Cell Ther Q1 · IF 4.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

CAR-T 治疗后复发的结局较差。针对 CAR-T 失败后使用一种独特的 CAR-T 细胞构建体的情况正在增加,但这种方法尚未得到充分描述。

在本研究中,CART-A 为首次接受的独特 CAR-T 细胞构建体,CART-B 为第二种,主要目标是描述 CART-B 后的结局。次要目标包括评估序贯 CAR-T 输注的安全性和毒性;研究潜在因素(如抗原调变和间隔治疗)对 CART-B 反应的影响;以及描述接受多次 CAR-T 的患者的长期结局。这是一项回顾性研究(NCT03827343),纳入接受 CAR-T 治疗且至少接受 2 种独特 CAR-T 构建体的 B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)儿童和年轻成人,排除同一产品的 interim CAR-T 再输注。在 135 例患者中,61 例(45.1%)接受了 2 种独特 CAR-T 构建体,其中 13 例随时间接受了 >2 次 CAR-T。本分析纳入的患者接受了 14 种不同的靶向 CD19 和/或 CD22 的 CAR-T。CART-A 时的中位年龄为 12.6 岁(范围,3.3 至 30.4 岁)。从 CART-A 到 CART-B 的中位时间为 302 天(范围,53 至 1183 天)。

48 例患者(78.7%)的 CART-B 靶向与 CART-A 不同的抗原,主要原因是 CART-A 抗原靶点丢失。CART-B 的完全缓解(CR)率(65.5%;40/61)低于 CART-A(88.5%;54/61;P = .0043);40 例 CART-B 缓解者中有 35 例(87.5%)的 CART-B 靶向与 CART-A 不同的抗原。在 21 例对 CART-B 达到部分缓解或无缓解的患者中,8 例(38.1%)接受的 CART-B 与 CART-A 具有相同抗原靶点。在 40 例 CART-B 完全缓解(CR)的患者中,29 例(72.5%)复发。在21例有可评估数据的患者中,复发免疫表型为抗原阴性3例(14.3%),抗原弱表达7例(33.3%),抗原阳性10例(47.6%),以及1例(4.8%)谱系转换。CART-B CR后中位无复发生存期为9.4个月(95% CI,6.1至13.2个月),总生存期为15.0个月(95% CI,13.0至22.7个月)。鉴于CAR-T 后复发可用的挽救治疗选择有限,确定CART-B的优化策略至关重要。

我们旨在提高对CAR-T 用于CAR-T 后失败这一新兴应用的认识,并强调伴随这一范式转变的临床意义。

展开英文摘要原文

Outcomes for post-chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy (CART) relapse are poor. The utilization of a unique CAR T cell construct for post-CART failure is increasing, but this approach is not well described. In this study, with CART-A the first unique CAR T cell construct received and CART-B the second, the primary objective was to characterize outcomes following CART-B. Secondary objectives included evaluating safety and toxicity with sequential CART infusions; investigating the impact of potential factors, such as antigen modulation and interval therapy, on CART-B response; and characterizing long-term outcomes in patients receiving multiple CARTs. This was a retrospective review (NCT03827343) of children and young adults with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) undergoing CART therapy who received at least 2 unique CART constructs, excluding interim CART reinfusions of the same product. Of 135 patients, 61 (45. 1%) received 2 unique CART constructs, including 13 who received >2 CARTs over time. Patients included in this analysis received 14 distinct CARTs targeting CD19 and/or CD22. The median age at CART-A was 12. 6 years (range, 3.

3 to 30. 4 years). The median time from CART-A to CART-B was 302 days (range, 53 to 1183 days). CART-B targeted a different antigen than CART-A in 48 patients (78. 7%), owing primarily to loss of CART-A antigen target. The rate of complete remission (CR) was lower with CART-B (65. 5%; 40 of 61) than with CART-A (88. 5%; 54 of 61; P = . 0043); 35 of 40 (87. 5%) CART-B responders had CART-B targeting a different antigen than CART-A. Among the 21 patients with a partial response or nonresponse to CART-B, 8 (38. 1%) received CART-B with the same antigen target as CART-A.

Of 40 patients with CART-B complete response (CR), 29 (72. 5%) relapsed. For the 21 patients with evaluable data, the relapse immunophenotype was antigen negative in 3 (14. 3%), antigen dim in 7 (33. 3%), antigen positive in 10 (47. 6%), and lineage switch in 1 (4. 8%).

The median relapse-free survival following CART-B CR was 9. 4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6. 1 to 13. 2 months), and overall survival was 15. 0 months (95% CI, 13. 0 to 22. 7 months). Given the limited salvage options for post-CART relapse, identifying optimizing strategies for CART-B is critical.

We raise awareness about the emerging use of CART for post-CART failure and highlight clinical implications accompanying this paradigm shift.

论文信息

作者
Holland EM、Yates B、Steinberg SM、Yuan CM、Wang HW、Annesley C、Shalabi H、Stroncek D
第一作者单位
Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.United States
通讯作者单位
Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Electronic address: nirali.shah@nih.gov.United States
文献类型
美国 NIH 院内研究
期刊
Transplantation and cellular therapy2023 Sep
原文标识
PubMed 37394115 · DOI 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.06.019