CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Difference in Efficacy and Safety of Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Containing 4-1BB and CD28 Co-Stimulatory Domains for B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
Difference in Efficacy and Safety of Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Containing 4-1BB and CD28 Co-Stimulatory Domains for B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
本研究量化了抗CD19嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法不同刺激结构域治疗B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)的疗效和安全性差异。检索了从数据库建库至2021年11月13日公共数据库中关于抗CD19 CAR-T 细胞治疗B-ALL的临床试验。通过建立参数生存函数,比较了含4-1BB和CD28共刺激结构域的抗CAR-T 细胞治疗B-ALL患者的OS和PFS差异。采用随机效应模型评估不同共刺激结构域的ORR、MRD阴性CR患者比例、CRS发生率和神经毒性。检验了ORR、MRD阴性CR、PFS和OS之间的相关性。
结果显示,含4-1BB和CD28共刺激结构域的抗CAR-T 细胞治疗的中位OS分别为15.0个月(95% CI:11.0-20.0)和8.5个月(95% CI:5.0-14.0),中位PFS分别为7.0个月(95% CI:4.0-11.5)和3.0个月(95% CI:1.5-7.0)。4-1BB共刺激结构域的抗CD19 CAR-T 细胞在达到ORR的患者中显示出更优的获益。CD28共刺激结构域的抗CD19 CAR-T 细胞神经毒性发生率显著高于4-1BB共刺激结构域。
此外,ORR和MRD阴性CR与OS和PFS密切相关,PFS与OS也密切相关。在B-ALL中,4-1BB共刺激结构域提示比CD28共刺激结构域具有更好的获益-风险比。
This study quantified the differences in the efficacy and safety of different stimulation domains of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Clinical trials related to anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for B-ALL were searched in public databases from database inception to 13 November 2021. The differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of B-ALL patients treated with anti-CAR T-cell therapy containing 4-1BB and CD28 co-stimulatory domains were compared by establishing a parametric survival function. The overall remission rate (ORR), the proportion of people with minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remission (CR), the incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and the neurotoxicity across different co-stimulatory domains was assessed using a random-effects model.
The correlation between the ORR, MRD-negative CR, PFS, and OS was tested. The results showed that the median OS of anti-CAR T-cell treatment containing 4-1BB and CD28 co-stimulatory domains was 15. 0 months (95% CI: 11. 0-20. 0) and 8. 5 months (95% CI: 5. 0-14. 0), and the median PFS was 7. 0 months (95% CI: 4. 0-11.
5) and 3. 0 months (95% CI: 1. 5-7. 0), respectively. Anti-CD19 CAR T-cells in the 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain showed superior benefits in patients who achieved ORR. The incidence of neurotoxicity was significantly higher in the CD28 co-stimulatory domain of anti-CD19 CAR T-cells than in the 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain.
In addition, the ORR and MRD-negative CR were strongly correlated with OS and PFS, and PFS and OS were strongly correlated. The 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain suggested a better benefit-risk ratio than the CD28 co-stimulatory domain in B-ALL.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。