← 返回

细胞因子诱导的杀伤细胞治疗食管癌优于单纯化疗

英文原题:Cytokine-induced killer cell treatment is superior to chemotherapy alone in esophageal cancer.

查看英文原题

Cytokine-induced killer cell treatment is superior to chemotherapy alone in esophageal cancer.

PubMed 2023/06/05(内容时间) Pathol Oncol Res Q2 · IF 2.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

由于缺乏这两种方案的直接比较,CIK 细胞与 DC 联合 CIK 细胞(DC-CIK)治疗食管癌(EC)的疗效仍不清楚。本研究通过网状 meta 分析评估 CIK 细胞与 DC-CIK 治疗 EC 的比较疗效和安全性。材料和方法:我们从既往 meta 分析中筛选符合条件的研究,然后进行更新检索,以获取 2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 7 月期间发表的额外试验。主要结局包括 OS、ORR 和 DCR,次要结局包括 QLIR 和 AEs。使用 ADDIS 软件对 12 项研究进行网状 meta 分析。

共纳入 12 项研究,其中 6 项比较 CIK 或 DC-CIK 联合化疗(CT)与单纯 CT。免疫治疗联合 CT 显著改善 OS(OR 4.10,95% CI 1.23-13.69)、ORR(OR 2.72,95% CI 1.79-4.11)、DCR(OR 3.45,95% CI 2.32-5.14)和 QLIR(OR 3.54,95% CI 2.31-5.41)。与单纯 CT 相比,DC-CIK+CT 降低了白细胞减少症的风险。然而,CIK-CT 与 DC-CIK+CT 之间未检测到统计学差异。

基于现有证据,我们得出结论,CIK 细胞治疗优于单纯 CT,但 CIK-CT 和 DC-CIK+CT 在治疗 EC 方面可能相当。然而,CIK-CT 与 DC-CIK+CT 的比较仅基于间接证据,因此无疑有必要开展研究,直接在 EC 患者中比较 CIK-CT 与 DC-CIK+CT。

展开英文摘要原文

Background: The therapeutic efficacy of cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells versus dendritic cells (DC) co-cultured with CIK cells (DC-CIK) in treating esophageal cancer (EC) remains unclear due to the absence of a direct comparison of these two regimens.

This study evaluated the comparative efficacy and safety of CIK cells versus DC-CIK using network meta-analysis in treating EC. Material and methods: We identified eligible studies from previous meta-analyses, then conducted an updated search to retrieve additional trials between February 2020 and July 2021. The primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR), and the secondary outcomes included quality of life improved rate (QLIR) and adverse events (AEs).

A network meta-analysis of 12 studies was conducted using ADDIS software. Results: Twelve studies were identified, including six comparing CIK or DC-CIK plus chemotherapy (CT) with CT alone. Immunotherapy plus CT significantly improved overall survival (OS) (odds ratio [OR] 4.

10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1. 23-13. 69), objective response rate (ORR) (OR 2. 72, 95% CI 1. 79-4. 11), disease control rate (DCR) (OR 3. 45, 95% CI 2. 32-5. 14), and quality of life improvement rate (QLIR) (OR 3. 54, 95% CI 2. 31-5. 41). DC-CIK+CT decreased the risk of leukopenia compared with CT alone.

However, no statistical difference was detected between CIK-CT and DC-CIK+CT. Conclusion: Based on the available evidence, we concluded that CIK cell treatment is superior to CT alone, but CIK-CT and DC-CIK+CT may be comparable in treating EC.

However, comparing CIK-CT and DC-CIK+CT is only based on indirect evidence, so it is undoubtedly necessary to conduct studies to compare CIK-CT with DC-CIK+CT in EC patients directly.

论文信息

作者
Sun J、Sun Y、Miniderima、Wang X
第一作者单位
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.Mongolia
通讯作者单位
Department of Oncology, Inner Mongolia Cancer Hospital and Affiliated People's Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.Mongolia
文献类型
网状荟萃分析
期刊
Pathology oncology research : POR2023
原文标识
PubMed 37342361 · DOI 10.3389/pore.2023.1610710