← 返回

供者来源 CD19 CAR-T 细胞对比化疗联合供者淋巴细胞输注治疗异基因造血干细胞移植后复发 CD19 阳性 B-ALL

英文原题:Donor-derived CD19 CAR-T Cells versus Chemotherapy Plus Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Treatment of Recurrent CD19-positive B-ALL After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

查看英文原题

Donor-derived CD19 CAR-T Cells versus Chemotherapy Plus Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Treatment of Recurrent CD19-positive B-ALL After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

PubMed 2023/06/17(内容时间) Curr Med Sci Q3 · IF 2(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

对于 allo-HSCT 后复发的 B-ALL 患者,供者来源的抗 CD19 CAR-T 细胞疗法可能比化疗-DLI 更好、更安全、更有效。

研究思路结论见上方概要

本研究旨在比较抗CD19CAR-T 细胞(CAR-T 细胞)与化疗联合供者淋巴细胞输注(chemo-DLI)治疗异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)后复发CD19阳性B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)的疗效。

回顾性分析43例allo-HSCT后复发B-ALL患者的临床资料。22例接受CAR-T 细胞治疗(CAR-T 组),21例接受化疗联合DLI(chemo-DLI组)。比较两组的完全缓解(CR)率和MRD阴性CR率、无白血病生存(LFS)率、总生存期(OS)率,以及急性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD)、细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)的发生率。

CAR-T 组的CR率和MRD阴性CR率(77.3%和61.5%)显著高于chemo-DLI组(38.1%和23.8%)(P=0.008和P=0.003)。CAR-T 组的1年和2年LFS率优于chemo-DLI组:54.5%和50.0% vs. 9.5%和4.8%(P=0.0001和P=0.00004)。CAR-T 组与chemo-DLI组的1年和2年OS率分别为59.1%和54.5% vs. 19%和9.5%(P=0.011和P=0.003)。chemo-DLI组中6例患者(28.6%)出现2-4级aGVHD。CAR-T 组中2例患者(9.1%)发生1-2级aGVHD。CAR-T 组中19例患者(86.4%)发生CRS,其中13例(59.1%)为1-2级CRS,6例(27.3%)为3级CRS。2例患者(9.1%)发生1-2级ICANS。

展开英文摘要原文

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) versus chemotherapy plus donor lymphocyte infusion (chemo-DLI) for treating relapsed CD19-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

Clinical data of 43 patients with B-ALL who relapsed after allo-HSCT were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-two patients were treated with CAR-T cells (CAR-T group), and 21 with chemotherapy plus DLI (chemo-DLI group). The complete remission (CR) and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative CR rates, leukemia-free survival (LFS) rate, overall survival (OS) rate, and incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were compared between the two groups.

The CR and MRD-negative CR rates in the CAR-T group (77.3% and 61.5%) were significantly higher than those in the chemo-DLI group (38.1% and 23.8%) (P=0.008 and P=0.003). The 1- and 2-year LFS rates in the CAR-T group were superior to those in the chemo-DLI group: 54.5% and 50.0% vs. 9.5% and 4.8% (P=0.0001 and P=0.00004). The 1- and 2-year OS rates in the CAR-T versus chemo-DLI group were 59.1% and 54.5% vs. 19% and 9.5% (P=0.011 and P=0.003). Six patients (28.6%) with grade 2-4 aGVHD were identified in the chemo-DLI group. Two patients (9.1%) in the CAR-T group developed grade 1-2 aGVHD. Nineteen patients (86.4%) developed CRS in the CAR-T group, comprising grade 1-2 CRS in 13 patients (59.1%) and grade 3 CRS in 6 patients (27.3%). Two patients (9.1%) developed grade 1-2 ICANS.

Donor-derived anti-CD19 CAR-T-cell therapy may be better, safer, and more effective than chemo-DLI for B-ALL patients who relapse after allo-HSCT.

论文信息

作者
Tan X、Wang XQ、Zhang C、Zhao XL、Yao H、Chen G、Ma YY、Wen Q
第一作者单位
Department of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.China
通讯作者单位
Department of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China. 13508331213@163.com.China
期刊
Current medical science2023 Aug
原文标识
PubMed 37330456 · DOI 10.1007/s11596-023-2746-1