← 返回

低危复发 B 细胞 ALL 中的 Blinatumomab 难题

英文原题:Blinatumomab Conundrum in Low-Risk Relapsed B-Cell ALL.

查看英文原题

Blinatumomab Conundrum in Low-Risk Relapsed B-Cell ALL.

PubMed 2023/06/13(内容时间) J Clin Oncol Q1 · IF 44.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究思路按摘要原文分段

儿童肿瘤学组(COG)AALL1331 试验表明,与造血干细胞移植(HSCT)前的强化化疗相比,接受 blinatumomab 治疗的高危/中危复发 ALL 儿童生存改善且毒性更低。AALL1331 的低危组比较了在单纯化疗基础上加用三个周期 blinatumomab,但未观察到生存改善。二次分析显示,伴有骨髓病变 ± 髓外(EM)受累的低危患者无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)改善(4 年 DFS 72.7% ± 5.8% 对 53.7% ± 6.7%;4 年 OS 97.1% ± 2.1% 对 84.8% ± 4.8%),但未能显示 blinatumomab 对孤立性 EM 复发患者具有优势。值得注意的是,孤立性 CNS(iCNS)复发的 DFS 在两个治疗组均为 24%,差于既往研究,可能原因是与既往方案相比 CNS 强化治疗减少,以及 blinatumomab 对控制 CNS 疾病不充分。病例:我们的晚期孤立性 CNS B 细胞 ALL 复发病例概述了临床医生在尝试降低毒性和避免 HSCT 时面临的挑战:(1)适当定义低危,(2)尝试减轻既往方案的治疗负担,(3)理解颅脑照射的方法和时机。方法:尽管不含 blinatumomab 的 AALL1331 治疗在孤立性睾丸复发患者中可带来极好的生存,但我们推荐对晚期 iCNS 复发患者采用改良的 AALL02P2 化疗骨架联合 1,800 cGy 颅脑放疗。未来整合具有更好 CNS 穿透性的CAR-T 细胞的研究,可能有助于减轻晚期 iCNS 复发患者的强化治疗负担。

展开英文摘要原文

UNLABELLED: The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology , to patients seen in their own clinical practice. BACKGROUND: The Children's Oncology Group (COG) AALL1331 trial demonstrated improved survival and less toxicity in children with high-/intermediate-risk relapsed ALL receiving blinatumomab compared with intensive chemotherapy before hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT). The low-risk arm of AALL1331 compared addition of three cycles of blinatumomab to chemotherapy alone, but a survival improvement was not noted. Secondary analyses showed improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of low-risk patients with bone marrow disease ± extramedullary (EM) involvement (4-year DFS 72.7% ± 5.8% v 53.7% ± 6.7%; 4-year OS 97.1% ± 2.1% v 84.8% ± 4.8%), but failed to show an advantage with blinatumomab for patients with isolated EM relapse. Of note, DFS of isolated CNS (iCNS) relapse was worse than previous studies at 24% on both arms, likely because of decreases in CNS-intensive therapy compared with previous approaches and inadequacy of blinatumomab for controlling CNS disease. CASE: Our case of late isolated CNS B-cell ALL relapse outlines challenges for clinicians attempting to decrease toxicity and avoid HSCT: (1) defining of low risk appropriately, (2) attempting to reduce the treatment burden of past protocols, and (3) understanding approach and timing of cranial irradiation. APPROACH: Although AALL1331 therapy without blinatumomab leads to excellent survival in patients with isolated testicular relapse, we recommend a modified AALL02P2 backbone of chemotherapy with 1,800 cGy cranial radiotherapy for patients with late iCNS relapse. Future studies integrating chimeric antigen receptor T cells, which have better CNS penetration, may help decrease the intensive treatment burden for patients with late iCNS recurrence.

论文信息

作者
Maese LD、Pulsipher MA
单位
Intermountain Primary Children's Hospital, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.United States
文献类型
综述 · 非美国政府资助研究 · 美国 NIH 资助研究
期刊
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2023 Sep 1
原文标识
PubMed 37311171 · DOI 10.1200/JCO.23.00594