← 返回

血液系统恶性肿瘤患者侵袭性真菌病的初级预防:德国血液学与肿瘤内科学会(DGHO)感染性疾病工作组(AGIHO)推荐意见 2022 更新

英文原题:Primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal diseases in patients with haematological malignancies: 2022 update of the recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO).

查看英文原题

Primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal diseases in patients with haematological malignancies: 2022 update of the recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO).

PubMed 2023/08/02(内容时间) J Antimicrob Chemother Q1 · IF 4.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

血液系统恶性肿瘤(HM)患者发生侵袭性真菌病(IFD)的风险较高,且发病率高、归因死亡率高。我们回顾了截至2021年9月发表的数据,以更新德国血液学和肿瘤内科学会(DGHO)2017年的抗真菌预防建议。对于长期中性粒细胞减少,即<500个细胞/L持续>7天的HM患者,给予抗真菌预防的强烈推荐保持不变。在这些患者中,泊沙康唑仍是具有抗霉菌活性的预防用药的首选药物。

我们考虑了HM的新型治疗选择,如CAR-T 细胞治疗或急性髓系白血病(AML)的新型靶向治疗,然而,数据不足以对这些患者常规抗真菌预防给出一般性建议。与2017年版相比,具体建议的主要变化是,对艾沙康唑和伏立康唑的建议现在为中等支持而非弱支持。

此外,已发表的关于米卡芬净的证据允许以中等强度推荐其用于HM。我们首次纳入了关于IFD的非药物措施建议,包括使用高效微粒空气(HEPA)过滤器、吸烟、施工期间的措施以及中性粒细胞减少饮食。

我们回顾了三唑类抗真菌预防与新型靶向治疗之间药物相互作用的影响,这些新型靶向治疗通过细胞色素p450代谢,而三唑类可抑制CYP3A4/5。工作组建议,当与强CYP3A4抑制性抗真菌药联合使用时,应降低venetoclax的剂量。

此外,我们回顾了新型抗真菌药物预防性使用的数据。目前尚无证据支持在临床实践中将其用于预防性治疗。

展开英文摘要原文

Patients with haematological malignancies (HM) are at high risk of developing invasive fungal disease (IFD) with high morbidity and attributable mortality.

We reviewed data published until September 2021 to update the 2017 antifungal prophylaxis recommendations of the German Society of Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO). The strong recommendation to administer antifungal prophylaxis in patients with HM with long-lasting neutropenia, i. e. <500 cells/ L for >7 days remains unchanged. Posaconazole remains the drug of choice for mould-active prophylaxis in these patients.

Novel treatment options in HM, such as CAR-T-cell treatment or novel targeted therapies for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) were considered, however, data are insufficient to give general recommendations for routine antifungal prophylaxis in these patients. Major changes regarding specific recommendations compared to the 2017 edition are the now moderate instead of mild support for the recommendations of isavuconazole and voriconazole.

Furthermore, published evidence on micafungin allows recommending it at moderate strength for its use in HM. For the first time we included recommendations for non-pharmaceutical measures regarding IFD, comprising the use of high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters, smoking, measures during construction work and neutropenic diets.

We reviewed the impact of antifungal prophylaxis with triazoles on drug-drug interactions with novel targeted therapies that are metabolized via cytochrome p450 where triazoles inhibit CYP3A4/5. The working group recommends reducing the dose of venetoclax when used concomitantly with strong CYP3A4 inhibiting antifungals.

Furthermore, we reviewed data on the prophylactic use of novel antifungal agents. Currently there is no evidence to support their use in a prophylactic setting in clinical practice.

论文信息

作者
Stemler J、Mellinghoff SC、Khodamoradi Y、Sprute R、Classen AY、Zapke SE、Hoenigl M、Krause R
第一作者单位
University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), Cologne, Germany.Germany
通讯作者单位
Department of Hematology, and Medical Oncology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.Germany
文献类型
综述
期刊
The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2023 Aug 2
原文标识
PubMed 37311136 · DOI 10.1093/jac/dkad143