CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:CRO infection and the Use of MRSA-active Medication for Prophylaxis affect the Prognosis of Patients with Hematological Malignancies after CAR-T Infusion.
CRO infection and the Use of MRSA-active Medication for Prophylaxis affect the Prognosis of Patients with Hematological Malignancies after CAR-T Infusion.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
碳青霉烯类耐药菌(CRO)是一个高度优先的问题,因为可用于治疗CRO感染的药物有限,且这些病原体在免疫抑制患者中快速复制,包括血液系统恶性肿瘤患者。嵌合抗原受体修饰T细胞(CAR-T)治疗后CRO感染的危险因素和预后尚不清楚。
本研究旨在分析血液系统恶性肿瘤患者接受CAR-T 治疗后CRO感染的危险因素,以及CAR-T 输注后1年的预后。纳入2018年6月至2020年12月期间在本中心诊断为血液系统恶性肿瘤并接受CAR-T 治疗的患者。病例组为CAR-T 输注后1年内发生CRO感染的35例患者,对照组为未发生CRO感染的280例患者。令人震惊的是,CRO患者治疗失败率为62.82%,而对照组为13.21%(P=0.000)。CRO定植(比值比[OR]=15.48,置信区间[CI](6.43-37.25),P=0.000)和低蛋白血症(OR=2.84,CI(1.20-6.73),P=0.018)的患者易发生CRO感染。CRO感染(风险比[HR]=4.40,CI(2.32-8.37),P=0.000)、含耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)活性药物的联合方案预防(HR=5.42,CI(2.65-11.11),P=0.000)以及CAR-T 输注后30天内发生的细菌感染(HR=1.97,CI(1.08-3.59),P=0.028)是1年内不良结局的危险因素。
本研究表明,CRO感染的预防应作为CAR-T 治疗的重中之重,应动态监测患者血清白蛋白水平并在必要时进行干预,同时预防性使用抗MRSA活性药物时需谨慎。
Carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) are a high priority issue because there are limited medications available to treat CRO infections, and these pathogens replicate rapidly in immunosuppressed patients, including those with hematological malignancy. Risk factors and prognosis of CRO infections after chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells (CAR-T) therapy are unclear.
This study was conducted to analyse the risk factors for CRO infection in patients with hematological malignancies following CAR-T therapy, and prognosis 1 year after CAR-T infusion. Patients who were diagnosed with hematological malignancies and treated with CAR-T therapy between June 2018 and December 2020 at our center were included. The case group consisted of 35 patients who developed CRO infections within 1 year of CAR-T infusion, and the control group comprised 280 patients who did not develop CRO infections. Shockingly, therapy failure occurred in 62. 82% of CRO patients vs. 13.
21% of the control group (P=0. 000). Patients with CRO colonization (odds ratio [OR]=15. 48, confidence interval [CI] (6. 43-37. 25), P=0. 000) and hypoproteinemia (OR=2. 84, CI (1. 20-6. 73), P=0. 018) were susceptible to CRO infections. CRO infections (hazard ratio [HR]=4. 40, CI (2. 32-8. 37), P=0.
000), prophylaxis with combination regimens containing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-active agents (HR=5. 42, CI (2. 65-11. 11), P=0. 000), and bacterial infections occurring within 30 days of CAR-T infusion (HR=1. 97, CI (1. 08-3. 59), P=0. 028) were risk factors for poor outcomes within 1 year.
This study shows that prophylaxis of CRO infection should be a top priority in CAR-T therapy, the serum albumin level of patients should be dynamically monitored and interventions put in place if necessary, and caution is required in prophylaxis with anti-MRSA activity agents.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。