CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Characterization of immune checkpoints expression and lymphocyte densities of iranian breast cancer patients; the co-expression status and clinicopathological associates.
Characterization of immune checkpoints expression and lymphocyte densities of iranian breast cancer patients; the co-expression status and clinicopathological associates.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
免疫检查点在乳腺癌某些分子亚型中表现出差异性的表达水平。此外,它们彼此之间、与增殖指数及组织学分级均显示出有意义的相关性。最后,相当大比例的乳腺癌共表达 PD-L1 和 LAG-3,这将使其成为未来联合 ICIs 的合适靶点。
乳腺恶性肿瘤目前是全球女性中最常见且最致命的肿瘤类型。晚期乳腺癌的治疗需要新的治疗策略。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨三种免疫检查点(PD-1、PD-L1和LAG-3)的表达及共表达状态,以及TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)评分,并进一步建立它们与临床病理特征之间的潜在相关性。
我们对361例乳腺癌病理样本进行了回顾性研究。采用免疫组化评估免疫检查点标志物的状态,并使用H&E染色对TILs进行评分。分析了肿瘤细胞和肿瘤相关免疫细胞的免疫检查点标志物及TIL评分与临床病理特征的相关性。
在361个评估样本中,LAG-3阳性率为51%,而IC PD-L1和TC PD-L1的检出率分别为36%和8.9%。此外,24.4%的样本中IC PD-L1和LAG-3均呈阳性染色。在核分级、核分裂分级和总体分级较高以及小管形成较多的肿瘤中,IC PD-L1表达显著更高。此外,TC PD-L1和LAG-3在总体分级较高方面也表现出类似趋势。雌激素受体和孕激素受体(ER和PR)表达阳性的肿瘤,其IC PD-L1和TC PD-L1染色显著较低,而LAG-3阳性在HER2阳性样本中更为常见。这些生物标志物阳性的肿瘤具有显著更高的Ki-67评分。LAG-3表达与PD-1和IC PD-L1表达呈显著相关。此外,与luminal A亚型相比,LAG-3和IC PD-L1的共表达在luminal B和三阴性亚型中显著更为常见。关于TILs,其在ER和PR阴性及HER2阳性样本中的评分显著更高。有趣的是,LAG-3、IC PD-L1和TC PD-L1染色阳性的样本具有显著更高的TIL评分。
Breast malignancies are now the most common and deadliest type of neoplasms among women worldwide. Novel therapeutic approaches are needed to combat advanced stages of breast cancer. In this study, we aimed to investigate the expression and co-expression status of three immune checkpoints (PD-1, PD-L1, and LAG-3), as well as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) scores, and to further establish their potential correlations with clinicopathologic features.
We performed a retrospective study on 361 pathologic samples of breast cancer. Immunohistochemistry was performed to assess the status of the immune checkpoint markers, and H&E staining was used to score TILs. The correlations of the immune checkpoint markers of tumor cells and tumor-associated immune cells and TIL scores with clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed.
Out of 361 assessed samples, LAG-3 was positive in 51%, while IC PD-L1 and TC PD-L1 were detectable in 36% and 8.9%, respectively. Moreover, both IC PD-L1 and LAG-3 stained positively in 24.4% of samples. IC PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in tumors with higher nuclear, mitotic, and overall grades and tubule formation. In addition, TC PD-L1 and LAG-3 exhibited a similar trend for higher overall grading. Tumors with positive estrogen- and progesterone-receptor (ER and PR) expression had significantly lower IC PD-L1 and TC PD-L1 staining, while LAG-3 positivity was more prevalent in HER2 positive samples. Tumors that were positive for these biomarkers had significantly higher Ki-67 scores. LAG-3 expression showed significant correlations with PD-1 and IC PD-L1 expression. Besides, the co-expression of LAG-3 and IC PD-L1 was significantly more encountered in luminal B and triple-negative subtypes, compared to the luminal A subtype. Regarding TILs, their scoring was significantly higher in ER and PR negative and HER2 positive samples. Intriguingly, samples with positive staining for LAG-3, IC PD-L1, and TC PD-L1 had significantly higher TIL scorings.
Immune checkpoints show differentially different levels of expression in certain molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Moreover, they reveal a meaningful correlation with each other, proliferation indices, and histologic grades. Finally, a sizable proportion of breast cancers co-express PD-L1 and LAG-3, which will make them appropriate targets for future combined ICIs.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。