CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Intensity of Cyclophosphamide-Based Bridging Therapy Before Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Myeloma.
Intensity of Cyclophosphamide-Based Bridging Therapy Before Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Myeloma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
接受自体CAR-T 细胞治疗的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者,在CAR-T 输注前可能需要桥接治疗(BT)以维持一定程度的疾病控制。烷化剂,如环磷酰胺(Cy),常用于方案中,既可用于高强度方案,如改良hyperCVAD(环磷酰胺、长春新碱、多柔比星和地塞米松),也可用于每周一次方案,如KCd(卡非佐米、环磷酰胺和地塞米松)。
然而,关于MM中最佳BT烷化剂剂量强度尚无共识。我们对截至2022年4月的5年期间所有计划接受自体CAR-T 治疗MM前BT的病例进行了单中心分析。
我们将桥接方案分为3个队列:(1)超分割Cy(HyperCy),每12至24小时住院给予Cy或作为持续i.v.输注;(2)较低强度Cy给药(WeeklyCy),如KCd;(3)NonCy,即BT中未使用烷化剂。收集所有患者的人口学、疾病相关和治疗相关特征。根据情况使用Fisher精确检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验和log-rank检验比较3个BT队列。
我们在64例独特患者中识别出70次独立BT实例,包括29例(41%)接受HyperCy、23例(33%)接受WeeklyCy和18例(26%)接受NonCy。3组BT期间Cy总剂量中位数分别为2100 mg/m 2、615 mg/m 2 和0 mg/m 2。年龄、既往治疗线数、三药耐药状态、高危细胞遗传学存在情况、髓外疾病、骨髓浆细胞负荷、采集前受累游离轻链(iFLC)动力学以及其他疾病侵袭性指标在3个队列间相当。在BT期间,iFLC水平升高25%和100 mg/L(近似疾病进展)在各队列中比例相当(P = .25):HyperCy为52%,WeeklyCy为39%,NonCy为28%。所有未后续进行CAR-T 的BT实例均因生产失败所致。在61例BT后接受CAR-T 的实例中,HyperCy的静脉到静脉时间略长(P = .03)(45天),而WeeklyCy为39天,NonCy为46.5天。
3个队列的中性粒细胞恢复时间相似,但HyperCy的血小板恢复时间较长(64天),而WeeklyCy为42天,NonCy为12天。各队列的无进展生存期相当,但中位总生存期(OS)不同:HyperCy为15.3个月,WeeklyCy为30.0个月,NonCy未达到。在我们对MM中CAR-T 治疗前BT的回顾性分析中,尽管Cy剂量高出3倍,HyperCy并未比WeeklyCy带来更优的疾病控制。相反,尽管疾病侵袭性和肿瘤负荷的测量结果相当,HyperCy与更长的CAR-T 后血小板恢复时间和更差的OS相关。研究局限性包括我们的样本量较小,以及MM侵袭性的格式塔标志物可能导致的混杂,这些标志物可能导致更差的结果以及医生决定处方HyperCy。鉴于复发/难治性MM对化疗的客观疾病缓解罕见,我们的分析表明,对于大多数需要在CAR-T 治疗前进行BT的患者,超分割Cy方案并不优于每周一次Cy方案。
Patients receiving autologous chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) may require bridging therapy (BT) before CAR-T infusion to maintain some level of disease control. Alkylators, such as cyclophosphamide (Cy), are often used in regimens, either in high-intensity regimens, such as modified hyperCVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone), or once-weekly regimens, such as KCd (carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone).
However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal BT alkylator dose intensity in MM.
We performed a single-center analysis of all instances of BT before planned autologous CAR-T for MM during a 5-year period ending in April 2022.
We classified bridging regimens into 3 cohorts: (1) hyperfractionated Cy (HyperCy) with inpatient Cy every 12 to 24 hours or as a continuous i. v. infusion; (2) less intensive Cy dosing (WeeklyCy), such as KCd; and (3) NonCy, in which no alkylators were used in BT. Demographic, disease-related, and treatment-related characteristics were collected for all patients. The 3 BT cohorts were compared using the Fisher exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and log-rank test, as appropriate.
We identified 70 discrete BT instances among 64 unique patients, including 29 (41%) with HyperCy, 23 (33%) with WeeklyCy, and 18 (26%) with NonCy. The median total Cy dosing during BT in the 3 groups were 2100 mg/m 2 , 615 mg/m 2 , and 0 mg/m 2 , respectively. Age, number of prior lines of therapy, triple-class refractory status, presence of high-risk cytogenetics, extramedullary disease, bone marrow plasma cell burden, involved free light chain (iFLC) kinetics before collection, and other measures of disease aggressiveness were comparable across the 3 cohorts. iFLC levels rose 25% and 100 mg/L during BT (approximating progressive disease) in comparable proportions (P = . 25) among the cohorts: 52% for HyperCy, 39% for WeeklyCy, and 28% for NonCy. All BT instances without subsequent CAR-T were due to manufacturing failures. Among 61 instances of BT followed by CAR-T, vein-to-vein times were slightly longer (P = . 03) with HyperCy (45 days) compared with WeeklyCy (39 days) and NonCy (46. 5 days).
Neutrophil recovery times were similar in the 3 cohorts, but platelet recovery took longer with HyperCy (64 days) compared with WeeklyCy (42 days) and NonCy (12 days). Progression-free survival was comparable among the cohorts, but median overall survival (OS) was not: 15. 3 months with HyperCy, versus 30. 0 months with WeeklyCy and not reached with NonCy. In our retrospective analysis of BT before CAR-T therapy in MM, HyperCy did not result in superior disease control than WeeklyCy despite a 3-fold higher dose of Cy.
In contrast, HyperCy was associated with longer post-CAR-T platelet recovery and worse OS despite comparable measurements of disease aggressiveness and tumor burden. Study limitations include our small sample size, as well as confounding from gestalt markers of MM aggressiveness that might have led to poorer outcomes as well as physicians' decision to prescribe HyperCy.
Given the rarity of objective disease responses to chemotherapy in relapsed/refractory MM, our analysis suggests that hyperfractionated Cy regimens do not outperform once-weekly Cy regimens for most patients who require BT before CAR-T therapy.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。