CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Access to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Clinical Trials in Underrepresented Populations: A Multicenter Cohort Study of Pediatric and Young Adult Acute Lymphobastic Leukemia Patients.
Access to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Clinical Trials in Underrepresented Populations: A Multicenter Cohort Study of Pediatric and Young Adult Acute Lymphobastic Leukemia Patients.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CAR-T 细胞疗法有望改善复发/难治性(r/r)B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)儿童和成人的生存,但社会经济地位(SES)较低或属于种族/族裔少数群体的患者,未必能同等获得临床试验机会。
本研究旨在描述参加 CAR-T 临床试验的儿童及青少年和青年成人(AYA)患者的社会人口学特征,并与其他 r/r B-ALL 患者比较。
我们在 5 个儿科联盟中心开展多中心回顾性队列研究,比较在所属联盟中心接受治疗并参加 CAR-T 试验的患者、在这些中心接受治疗的其他 r/r B-ALL 患者,以及从外院转诊参加 CAR-T 试验的患者的社会人口学特征。纳入 2012–2018 年在联盟中心之一接受治疗、年龄 0–27 岁的 r/r B-ALL 患者。研究从电子病历收集临床和人口学数据,计算患者居所至治疗机构的距离,并根据人口普查区分配 SES 评分。337 例接受 r/r B-ALL 治疗的患者中,112 例由外院转诊至联盟中心并参加 CAR-T 试验;225 例主要在联盟中心接受治疗,其中 34% 参加 CAR-T 试验。
主要在联盟中心接受治疗的患者无论是否参加试验,特征相似。与主要在联盟中心治疗并参加 CAR-T 试验者相比,外院转诊患者中的西班牙裔患者比例较低(37% vs 56%;P=0.03)、首选西班牙语者比例较低(8% vs 22%;P=0.006),公共保险患者比例也较低(38% vs 65%;P=0.001)。外院转诊至 CAR-T 中心的患者中,西班牙裔、西班牙语使用者或公共保险参保者代表不足。外院医师的隐性偏见也可能影响这些患者的转诊。建立 CAR-T 中心与外院之间的合作关系,可能提高医师熟悉度、改善患者转诊并增加患者参与 CAR-T 临床试验的机会。
Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy is a promising approach to improve survival for children and adults with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), but these clinical trials might not be equally accessible to patients of low socioeconomic status (SES) or to patients from racial or ethnic minority groups.
We sought to describe the sociodemographic characteristics of pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients enrolled in CAR-T clinical trials and to compare these characteristics to those of other patients with r/r B-ALL.
We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study at 5 pediatric consortium sites to compare the sociodemographic characteristics of patients treated and enrolled in CAR-T trials at their home institution, other patients with r/r B-ALL treated at these sites, and patients referred from an external hospital for CAR-T trials. The patients were age 0 to 27 years with r/r B-ALL treated at 1 of the consortium sites between 2012 and 2018. Clinical and demographic data were collected from the electronic health record.
We calculated distance from home to treating institution and assigned SES scores based on census tract. Among the 337 patients treated for r/r B-ALL, 112 were referred from an external hospital to a consortium site and enrolled in a CAR-T trial and 225 were treated primarily at a consortium site, with 34% enrolled in a CAR-T trial. Patients treated primarily at a consortium site had similar characteristics regardless of trial enrollment. Lower proportions of Hispanic patients (37% versus 56%; P = . 03), patients whose preferred language was Spanish (8% versus 22%; P = .
006), and publicly insured patients (38% versus 65%; P = . 001) were referred from an external hospital than were treated primarily at a consortium site and enrolled in a CAR-T trial. Patients who are Hispanic, Spanish-speaking, or publicly insured are underrepresented in referrals from external hospitals to CAR-T centers.
External provider implicit bias also may influence referral of these patients. Establishing partnerships between CAR-T centers and external hospital sites may improve provider familiarity, patient referral, and patient access to CAR-T clinical trials.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。