← 返回

BCMA CAR-T 细胞治疗在老年多发性骨髓瘤患者中的安全性与疗效

英文原题:Safety and Efficacy of BCMA CAR-T Cell Therapy in Older Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

查看英文原题

Safety and Efficacy of BCMA CAR-T Cell Therapy in Older Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

PubMed 2023/03/17(内容时间) Transplant Cell Ther Q1 · IF 4.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者接受B细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)CAR-T 细胞治疗的风险包括细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)、免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)、血细胞减少和感染。老年患者可能更常见跌倒和谵妄等并发症,但BCMA CAR-T 在老年人群中的疗效和安全性尚未得到充分分析。

我们拟比较老年患者(输注时年龄≥70岁)和较年轻MM患者接受BCMA CAR-T 的疗效与安全性。本机构5年期间所有接受自体BCMA CAR-T 治疗的MM患者均纳入分析。主要终点包括CRS和ICANS发生率、绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)恢复所需天数、低丙种球蛋白血症发生率(IgG<400 mg/dL)、6个月内感染、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。共分析83例患者(年龄范围33–77岁),其中22例(27%)输注时年龄≥70岁。老年组肌酐清除率较低(中位数67.3比91.9 mL/min,P<0.001),体能状态评分为1的患者比例较高(59%比30%,P=0.02),其他特征相似。两组任何级别CRS、任何级别ICANS及ANC恢复所需天数相近。

基线低丙种球蛋白血症发生率在老年和年轻患者中分别为36%和30%(P=0.60);输注后分别为82%和72%(P=0.57)。老年组感染发生率为36%(n=8),年轻组为52%(n=32)(P=0.22)。两组记录的跌倒(9%比15%,P=0.72)或非ICANS谵妄(5%比7%,P=1.0)均无统计学显著差异。老年患者中位PFS为13.1个月(95%置信区间[CI]9.2个月至未达到[NR]),年轻患者为12.5个月(95% CI 11.3–22.5个月,P=0.42)。老年组OS中位数尚未达到(95% CI NR–NR),年轻组为31.4个月(95% CI 24.8个月至NR),P=0.04。

然而,校正高危细胞遗传学、三类药物难治、髓外疾病和骨髓浆细胞负荷后,年龄≥70岁并非OS显著预测因素。尽管样本量较小且存在未测量混杂因素,本回顾性分析未显示老年患者CAR-T 毒性显著增加,也包括跌倒、谵妄等老年人群相关毒性。年龄≥70岁患者OS略好这一反常发现,在回归模型中并不显著,可能是由于老年人群中选择了身体状况较好的CAR-T 候选患者所致。

总体而言,BCMA CAR-T 仍是老年MM患者安全有效的治疗选择。

展开英文摘要原文

Risks of B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) include cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), cytopenias, and infections. The efficacy and safety of BCMA CAR-T therapy in the geriatric setting, including complications such as falls and delirium, which may be more prevalent in older patients, have not been fully analyzed.

We wanted to analyze the efficacy and safety of BCMA CAR-T therapy among older patients (age 70 at infusion) versus younger patients with MM.

We analyzed all patients with MM who received any autologous BCMA CAR-T therapy over a 5-year period at our institution. Key endpoints included CRS, ICANS incidence, days to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery, incidence of hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG < 400 mg/dL), infections within 6 months, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Of 83 analyzed patients (age range 33-77), 22 (27%) were aged 70 at infusion. The older cohort had lower creatinine clearances (median 67. 3 versus 91. 9 mL/min, P < . 001) and a higher proportion of patients with performance status 1 (59% versus 30%, P = . 02) but were otherwise similar. Rates of any-grade CRS, any-grade ICANS, and days to ANC recovery were similar between groups.

Rates of baseline hypogammaglobulinemia were 36% in older patients and 30% in younger patients (P = . 60), whereas post-infusion hypogammaglobulinemia occurred in 82% versus 72%, respectively (P = . 57). Infections occurred in 36% (n = 8) of the older cohort versus 52% (n = 32) of the younger cohort (P = . 22). There were no statistically significant differences between the older and younger cohorts in terms of documented falls (9% versus 15%, P = .

72) or non-ICANS delirium (5% versus 7%, P = 1. 0). Median PFS was 13. 1 months in older patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 9. 2-not reached [NR]) versus 12. 5 months in younger patients (95% CI 11. 3-22. 5, P = . 42. Median OS was not reached in the older cohort (95% CI, NR-NR) versus 31. 4 months in the younger cohort (95% CI, 24. 8-NR) with P = . 04.

However, age 70 was not a significant predictor of OS after adjusting for high-risk cytogenetics, triple-class refractoriness, extramedullary disease, and bone marrow plasma cell burden. Although limited by small sample size and unmeasured confounders, our retrospective analysis did not demonstrate significant increases in CAR-T toxicity among older patients. This included toxicities associated with geriatric populations such as falls and delirium.

Our paradoxical finding of borderline better OS among patients aged 70, which was not significant in regression modeling, may have been due to selection bias in favor of disproportionately healthy CAR-T candidates in the geriatric population.

Overall, BCMA CAR-T remains a safe and effective option for older patients with MM.

论文信息

作者
Reyes KR、Huang CY、Lo M、Arora S、Chung A、Wong SW、Wolf J、Olin RL
第一作者单位
School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.United States
通讯作者单位
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: rahul.banerjee.md@gmail.com.United States
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Transplantation and cellular therapy2023 Jun
原文标识
PubMed 36933659 · DOI 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.03.012