粒细胞集落刺激因子与复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤 CAR-T 细胞治疗毒性和疗效的关联

Eight patients were given G-CSF after successful management of CRS, and no CRS re-occurred thereafter. Of the remaining 105 patients that were finally analyzed, 72 (68.6%) received G-CSF (G-CSF group), and 33 (31.4%) did not (non G-CSF group). We mainly analyzed the incidence and severity of CRS or NEs in two groups of patients, as well as the associations of G-CSF timing, cumulative dose and cumulative time with CRS, NEs and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy.

Both groups of patients had similar duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia, and the incidence and severity of CRS or NEs.There were also no differences in the incidence and severity of CRS or NEs between patients with the timing of G-CSF administration 3 days and those >3 days after CAR T-cell infusion. The incidence of CRS was greater in patients receiving cumulative doses of G-CSF >1500 g or cumulative time of G-CSF administration >5 days. Among patients with CRS, there was no difference in the severity of CRS between patients who used G-CSF and those who did not. The duration of CRS in anti-BCMA and anti-CD19 CAR T-cell-treated patients was prolonged after G-CSF administration. There were no significant differences in the overall response rate at 1 and 3 months between the G-CSF group and the non-G-CSF group.

Our results showed that low-dose or short-time use of G-CSF was not associated with the incidence or severity of CRS or NEs, and G-CSF administration did not influence the antitumor activity of CAR T-cell therapy.