CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:High response rates and transition to transplant after novel targeted and cellular therapies in adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia with Philadelphia-like fusions.
High response rates and transition to transplant after novel targeted and cellular therapies in adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia with Philadelphia-like fusions.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
费城染色体样(Ph-like)急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者对标准化疗应答较差。然而,新型抗体和细胞疗法治疗复发/难治性(r/r)Ph-like ALL的结局尚不明确。
我们对96例接受新型挽救治疗、患有r/r B-ALL且携带Ph-like相关融合基因的成人患者开展单中心回顾性分析。患者共接受149个新型治疗方案,包括blinatumomab 83个、inotuzumab ozogamicin(InO)36个和CD19 CAR-T 细胞30个。首次接受新型挽救治疗时患者中位年龄为36岁(范围18–71岁)。Ph-like融合基因为IGH::CRLF2(n=48)、P2RY8::CRLF2(n=26)、JAK2(n=9)、ABL类(n=8)、EPOR::IGH(n=4)和ETV6::NTRK2(n=1)。与blinatumomab和InO相比,CD19 CAR-T 在治疗后期使用(p<0.001),且更常用于异基因造血细胞移植(alloHCT)后复发的受者(p=0.002)。
blinatumomab治疗患者年龄高于InO和CAR-T 治疗患者(p=0.004)。blinatumomab、InO和CD19 CAR治疗后的完全缓解(CR)/血液学未完全恢复的CR(CRi)率分别为63%、72%和90%;应答者中分别有50%、50%和44%接受alloHCT巩固治疗。多变量分析显示,新型疗法类型(p=0.044)和治疗前骨髓原始细胞比例(p=0.006)可预测CR/CRi率;而Ph-like融合亚型(p=0.016)、治疗前骨髓原始细胞比例(p=0.022)以及应答后alloHCT巩固治疗(p<0.001)会影响无事件生存期。
总之,新型疗法可有效诱导r/r Ph-like ALL患者获得较高缓解率,并使应答者顺利过渡至alloHCT。
Philadelphia (Ph)-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with a poor response to standard chemotherapy.
However, outcomes with novel antibody and cellular therapies in relapsed/refractory (r/r) Ph-like ALL are largely unknown.
We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of adult patients (n = 96) with r/r B-ALL and fusions associated with Ph-like who received novel salvage therapies. Patients were treated with 149 individual novel regimens (blinatumomab = 83, inotuzumab ozogamicin [InO] = 36, and CD19CAR T cells = 30). The median age at first novel salvage therapy was 36 years (range; 18-71). Ph-like fusions were IGH::CRLF2 (n = 48), P2RY8::CRLF2 (n = 26), JAK2 (n = 9), ABL-class (n = 8), EPOR::IGH (n = 4) and ETV6::NTRK2 (n = 1). CD19CAR T cells were administered later in the course of therapy compared to blinatumomab and InO (p < . 001) and more frequently in recipients who relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) (p = .
002). Blinatumomab was administered at an older age compared to InO and CAR T-cells (p = . 004). The complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rates were 63%, 72%, and 90% following blinatumomab, InO and CD19CAR, respectively, among which 50%, 50%, and 44% of responders underwent consolidation with alloHCT, respectively.
In multivariable analysis, the type of novel therapy (p = . 044) and pretreatment marrow blasts (p = . 006) predicted the CR/CRi rate, while the Ph-like fusion subtype (p = . 016), pretreatment marrow blasts (p = . 022) and post-response consolidation with alloHCT (p < . 001) influenced event-free survival.
In conclusion, novel therapies are effective in inducing high remission rates in patients with r/r Ph-like ALL and successfully transitioning the responders to alloHCT.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。