RNF43 p.G659fs 通过 PI3K/AKT/mTOR 信号通路和 HLA-E 上调导致 MSI-high 结直肠癌中 NK 细胞功能障碍
RNF43 p.G659fs leads to natural killer cell dysfunction in MSI-high colorectal cancer through PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling and HLA-E up-regulation.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Prognostic RNA-editing signature predicts immune functions and therapy responses in gliomas.
Prognostic RNA-editing signature predicts immune functions and therapy responses in gliomas.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
RNA编辑是转录后转录本发生改变的过程,可导致蛋白质异构体形成并促进多种肿瘤进展,但其在胶质瘤中的作用尚知之甚少。
本研究旨在识别胶质瘤中与预后相关的RNA编辑位点(PRE),并探究其对胶质瘤的具体影响及潜在作用机制。
从癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)数据库和SYNAPSE平台获取胶质瘤基因组及临床数据。通过回归分析识别PRE,并采用生存分析和受试者工作特征曲线评估相应预后模型。对风险组间差异表达基因进行功能富集分析,以探索作用机制。采用CIBERSORT、单样本基因集富集分析(ssGSEA)、基因集变异分析及ESTIMATE算法,评估PRE风险评分与肿瘤微环境变化、免疫细胞浸润、免疫检查点和免疫应答的关联。采用maftools和pRRophetic软件包评估肿瘤突变负荷并预测药物敏感性。
共鉴定出35个与胶质瘤预后相关的RNA编辑位点。功能富集分析提示不同组之间免疫相关通路存在差异。值得注意的是,PRE风险评分较高的胶质瘤样本具有较高免疫评分、较低肿瘤纯度、更多巨噬细胞和调节性T细胞浸润、NK细胞活化受抑、免疫功能评分升高、免疫检查点基因表达上调及肿瘤突变负荷增加;这些特征均提示免疫治疗应答较差。最后,高风险胶质瘤样本对Z-LLNle-CHO和替莫唑胺更敏感,而低风险样本对Lisitinib反应更好。
我们确定了由35个RNA编辑位点组成的PRE特征,并计算了相应风险系数。总风险评分较高提示预后较差、免疫应答较差且对免疫治疗敏感性较低。该新型PRE特征可帮助胶质瘤患者进行风险分层、预测免疫治疗应答、制定个体化治疗策略并开发新疗法。
Background: RNA-editing refers to post-transcriptional transcript alterations that lead to the formation of protein isoforms and the progression of various tumors.
However, little is known about its roles in gliomas. Aim: The aim of this study is to identify prognosis-related RNA-editing sites (PREs) in glioma, and to explore their specific effects on glioma and potential mechanisms of action. Methods: Glioma genomic and clinical data were obtained from TCGA database and SYNAPSE platform. The PREs was identified with regression analyses and the corresponding prognostic model was evaluated with survival analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve. Functional enrichment of differentially expressed genes between risk groups was performed to explore action mechanisms.
The CIBERSORT, ssGSEA, gene set variation analysis, and ESTIMATE algorithms were employed to assess the association between PREs risk score and variations of tumor microenvironment, immune cell infiltration, immune checkpoints, and immune responses. The maftools and pRRophetic packages were used to evaluate tumor mutation burden and predict drug sensitivity. Results: A total of thirty-five RNA-editing sites were identified as prognosis-related in glioma. Functional enrichment implied variation of immune-related pathways between groups.
Notably, glioma samples with higher PREs risk score exhibited higher immune score, lower tumor purity, increased infiltration of macrophage and regulatory T cells, suppressed NK cell activation, elevated immune function score, upregulated immune checkpoint gene expression, and higher tumor mutation burden, all of which implied worse response to immune therapy.
Finally, high-risk glioma samples are more sensitive to Z-LLNle-CHO and temozolomide, while the low-risk ones respond better to Lisitinib. Conclusion: We identified a PREs signature of thirty-five RNA editing sites and calculated their corresponding risk coefficients.
Higher total signature risk score indicates worse prognosis and worse immune response and lower sensitivity to immune therapy. The novel PREs signature could help risk stratification, immunotherapy response prediction, individualized treatment strategy-making for glioma patients, and development of novel therapeutic approaches.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。