← 返回

晚期黑色素瘤和非黑色素瘤皮肤癌治疗的经典与新型策略

英文原题:Classic and new strategies for the treatment of advanced melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer.

查看英文原题

Classic and new strategies for the treatment of advanced melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer.

PubMed 2023/02/09(内容时间) Front Med (Lausanne) Q1 · IF 3.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

晚期黑色素瘤和非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(NMSCs)预后极差。为改善这些患者的生存率,针对黑色素瘤和NMSCs的免疫治疗及靶向治疗研究正在迅速增加。BRAF和MEK抑制剂改善了临床结局,抗PD1治疗在晚期黑色素瘤患者生存方面优于化疗或抗CTLA4治疗。近年来,nivolumab联合ipilimumab的联合治疗因其在晚期黑色素瘤患者中的生存获益和缓解率优势而在研究中逐渐受到重视。

此外,针对III期和IV期黑色素瘤的新辅助治疗,无论是单药还是联合治疗,近期也引起了讨论。近期研究中另一个有前景的策略是抗PD-1/PD-L1免疫治疗联合抗BRAF加抗MEK靶向治疗的三联方案。相反,在晚期和转移性BCC中,成功的治疗策略如vismodegib和sonidegib,是基于抑制Hedgehog信号通路的异常激活。在这些患者中,cemiplimab抗PD-1治疗应保留作为疾病进展或反应不佳时的二线治疗。对于不适合手术或放疗的局部晚期或转移性SCC患者,抗PD1药物如cemiplimab、pembrolizumab和cosibelimab(CK-301)在缓解率方面显示出显著结果。

PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂如avelumab也已用于Merkel癌,在半数晚期疾病患者中实现了缓解。MCC最新出现的前景是局部区域方法,即注射能够刺激免疫系统的药物。与免疫治疗联合使用的最有前景的两种分子是cavrotolimod(一种Toll样受体9激动剂)和一种Toll样受体7/8激动剂。另一个研究领域是细胞免疫治疗,使用经IL-15类似物刺激的NK 细胞或经肿瘤新抗原刺激的CD4/CD8细胞。在CSCC中采用cemiplimab新辅助治疗以及在MCC中采用nivolumab新辅助治疗已显示出有前景的结果。尽管这些新药取得了成功,但未来面临的新挑战将是根据生物标志物和肿瘤微环境参数来选择将从这些治疗中获益的患者。

展开英文摘要原文

Advanced melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are burdened with a dismal prognosis. To improve the survival of these patients, studies on immunotherapy and target therapies in melanoma and NMSCs are rapidly increasing.

BRAF and MEK inhibitors improve clinical outcomes, and anti-PD1 therapy demonstrates better results than chemotherapy or anti-CTLA4 therapy in terms of the survival of patients with advanced melanoma. In recent years, the combination therapy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab has gained ground in studies for its survival and response rate benefits in patients with advanced melanoma.

In addition, neoadjuvant treatment for stages III and IV melanoma, either as monotherapy or combination therapy, has recently been discussed. Another promising strategy evaluated in recent studies is the triple combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and anti-BRAF plus anti-MEK targeted therapy. On the contrary, in advanced and metastatic BCC, successful therapeutic strategies, such as vismodegib and sonidegib, are based on the inhibition of aberrant activation of the Hedgehog signaling pathway. In these patients, anti-PD-1 therapy with cemiplimab should be reserved as the second-line therapy in case of disease progression or poor response. In patients with locally advanced or metastatic SCC, who are not candidates for surgery or radiotherapy, anti-PD1 agents such as cemiplimab, pembrolizumab, and cosibelimab (CK-301) have shown significant results in terms of response rate.

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, such as avelumab, have also been used in Merkel carcinoma, achieving responses in half of the patients with advanced disease. The latest prospect emerging for MCC is the locoregional approach involving the injection of drugs that can stimulate the immune system. Two of the most promising molecules used in combination with immunotherapy are cavrotolimod (a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist) and a Toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist.

Another area of study is cellular immunotherapy with natural killer cells stimulated with an IL-15 analog or CD4/CD8 cells stimulated with tumor neoantigens. Neoadjuvant treatment with cemiplimab in CSCCs and nivolumab in MCCs has shown promising results. Despite the successes of these new drugs, the new challenges ahead will be to select patients who will benefit from these treatments based on biomarkers and parameters of the tumor microenvironment.

论文信息

作者
Rubatto M、Sciamarrelli N、Borriello S、Pala V、Mastorino L、Tonella L、Ribero S、Quaglino P
单位
Department of Medical Sciences, Dermatologic Clinic, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.Italy
文献类型
综述
期刊
Frontiers in medicine2022
原文标识
PubMed 36844955 · DOI 10.3389/fmed.2022.959289