CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:CD19 CAR T cells are an effective therapy for posttransplant relapse in patients with B-lineage ALL: real-world data from Germany.
CD19 CAR T cells are an effective therapy for posttransplant relapse in patients with B-lineage ALL: real-world data from Germany.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
对于异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)后复发、复发超过一次或 upfront 耐药的前体 B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(pB-ALL)患者,预后极差。CD19 靶向嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞已发展成为强效的免疫疗法。Tisagenlecleucel(Tisa-cel)是一种市售的自体 CD19 导向 CAR-T 细胞产品。
我们开展了一项回顾性研究,邀请德国所有 CAR-T 细胞中心参与。共纳入 81 例 pB-ALL 患者。CAR-T 细胞输注后 28 天,71 例患者(87.7%)达到完全缓解,8 例(9.9%)未缓解。2 年时,无事件生存期概率(pEFS)、无复发生存概率(pRFS)和总生存期概率(pOS)分别为 45.3%、51.7% 和 53.2%。无既往 allo-HSCT 患者(n = 16,55.0%)与有既往 allo-HSCT 患者(n = 65,43.4%)的 pEFS 无差异。在 allo-HSCT 后接受治疗的患者中,allo-HSCT 后至复发的时间是结局的强预测因素。allo-HSCT 后 6 个月内复发的患者 pEFS 仅为 18.4%(pOS = 16.0%),令人失望;较晚复发者的 pEFS 为 55.5%(pOS = 74.8%)。
我们的研究提供了 Tisa-cel 治疗儿童、青少年和年轻成人 ALL 患者的真实世界经验,其中大多数患者是在 allo-HSCT 后复发后接受治疗。共有 45.3% 的患者通过单次 Tisa-cel 剂量获得挽救。
我们的新发现是,allo-HSCT 后 ALL 患者若复发发生在 6 个月之后,其 pEFS 远优于早期复发者,这可能有助于临床决策,并促使开展研究以揭示其原因。
Patients with precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (pB-ALL) who have relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), have relapsed more than once, or are resistant upfront have a dismal prognosis. CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have evolved as potent immune therapies. Tisagenlecleucel (Tisa-cel) is a commercially available autologous CD19-directed CAR T-cell product.
We performed a retrospective study inviting all CAR T-cell centers in Germany to participate. Eighty-one patients with pB-ALL were included. Twenty-eight days after CAR T-cell infusion, 71 patients (87. 7%) were in complete response, and 8 (9. 9%) were in nonremission. At 2 years, the probabilities of event-free survival (pEFS), relapse-free survival (pRFS), and overall survival (pOS) were 45. 3%, 51.
7%, and 53. 2%, respectively. pEFS was not different in patients without (n = 16, 55. 0%) vs with prior allo-HSCT (n = 65, 43. 4%). In patients treated after allo-HSCT, the time to relapse after allo-HSCT was a strong predictor of outcome. Patients relapsing within 6 months of allo-HSCT had a disappointing pEFS of 18. 4% (pOS = 16. 0%); the pEFS for those relapsing later was 55. 5% (pOS = 74. 8%).
Our study provides real-world experience in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with ALL treated with Tisa-cel, where most patients were treated after having relapsed after allo-HSCT. A total of 45. 3% were rescued with a single dose of Tisa-cel.
Our novel finding that patients with ALL after allo-HSCT had by far a better pEFS if relapse occurred beyond 6 months might be helpful in clinical decision-making and motivates studies to uncover the reasons.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。