← 返回

HER2 阳性乳腺癌新辅助治疗期间的生存结局、数字 TILs 与治疗中 PET/CT:随机 PREDIX HER2 试验结果

英文原题:Survival Outcomes, Digital TILs, and On-treatment PET/CT During Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-positive Breast Cancer: Results from the Randomized PREDIX HER2 Trial.

查看英文原题

Survival Outcomes, Digital TILs, and On-treatment PET/CT During Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-positive Breast Cancer: Results from the Randomized PREDIX HER2 Trial.

PubMed 2023/02/01(内容时间) Clin Cancer Res Q1 · IF 10.9(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

新辅助 T-DM1 的长期结局与新辅助 THP 相似。HER2 阳性乳腺癌新辅助治疗两个周期后的 SUVmax 可能是短期和长期结局的独立预测因子。与 TILs 联合评估可能有助于早期筛选出反应不佳者以采用替代治疗策略。

研究思路结论见上方概要

PREDIX HER2是一项随机II期试验,比较了新辅助多西他赛、曲妥珠单抗和帕妥珠单抗(THP)与曲妥珠单抗 emtansine(T-DM1)在HER2阳性乳腺癌中的疗效。两组之间的病理完全缓解(pCR)率没有差异。在此,我们呈现PREDIX HER2的生存结局,并探讨代谢反应和TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)作为预后因素。

共纳入202例HER2阳性乳腺癌患者,197例患者接受了六个周期的THP或T-DM1治疗。次要终点包括无事件生存期(EFS)、无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)。在基线、两个和六个治疗周期后进行了PET/CT评估。TIL在基线活检中手动评估,而TIL的基于图像的评估[数字TIL(DTIL)]在数字化的全脸切片中进行。

中位随访5.21年后,两个治疗组在EFS(HR = 1.26;95% CI,0.54-2.91)、RFS(HR = 0.69;95% CI,0.24-1.93)或OS(HR = 0.52;95% CI,0.09-2.82)方面均无差异。第2周期(C2)较高的SUVmax预示较低的pCR(ORadj = 0.65;95% CI,0.48-0.87;P = 0.005)和较差的EFS(HRadj = 1.27;95% CI,1.12-1.41;P < 0.001)。基线TILs和DTILs在临床参数和C2 SUVmax之外提供了额外的预后信息。

展开英文摘要原文

PREDIX HER2 is a randomized Phase II trial that compared neoadjuvant docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (THP) with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for HER2-positive breast cancer. Rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) did not differ between the two groups. Here, we present the survival outcomes from PREDIX HER2 and investigate metabolic response and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) as prognostic factors.

In total, 202 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer were enrolled and 197 patients received six cycles of either THP or T-DM1. Secondary endpoints included event-free survival (EFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Assessment with PET/CT was performed at baseline, after two and six treatment cycles. TILs were assessed manually at baseline biopsies, while image-based evaluation of TILs [digital TILs (DTIL)] was performed in digitized full-face sections.

After a median follow-up of 5.21 years, there was no difference between the two treatment groups in terms of EFS [HR = 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54-2.91], RFS (HR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.24-1.93), or OS (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.09-2.82). Higher SUVmax at cycle 2 (C2) predicted lower pCR (ORadj = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.87; P = 0.005) and worse EFS (HRadj = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.12-1.41; P < 0.001). Baseline TILs and DTILs provided additional prognostic information to clinical parameters and C2 SUVmax.

Long-term outcomes following neoadjuvant T-DM1 were similar to neoadjuvant THP. SUVmax after two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer may be an independent predictor of both short- and long-term outcomes. Combined assessment with TILs may facilitate early selection of poor responders for alternative treatment strategies.

论文信息

作者
Matikas A、Johansson H、Grybäck P、Bjöhle J、Acs B、Boyaci C、Lekberg T、Fredholm H
单位
Breast Center, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Stockholm, Sweden.Sweden
文献类型
II 期临床试验 · 随机对照试验 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023 Feb 1
原文标识
PubMed 36449695 · DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-2829