PROTAC 工程化蛋白/DNA 纳米抗原是癌症免疫治疗中树突状细胞疫苗的有效增强剂
PROTAC-Engineered Protein/DNA Nanoantigen is a Potent Booster for Dendritic Cell Vaccines in Cancer Immunotherapy.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Dendritic Cell-Derived Artificial Microvesicles Inhibit RLS(40) Lymphosarcoma Growth in Mice via Stimulation of Th1/Th17 Immune Response.
Dendritic Cell-Derived Artificial Microvesicles Inhibit RLS(40) Lymphosarcoma Growth in Mice via Stimulation of Th1/Th17 Immune Response.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
无细胞抗肿瘤疫苗是癌症免疫治疗的一种有前景的方法。在此,我们在耐药性淋巴肉瘤 RLS40 小鼠体内模型中,比较了基于树突状细胞(DC)来源微囊泡的无细胞疫苗与基于 DC 和阳离子脂质体的疫苗的抗肿瘤潜力。疫苗如下:微囊泡疫苗——使用含胆固醇/精胺的阳离子脂质体 L 或甘露糖化脂质体 ML 将总肿瘤 RNA 负载至 DC 后,经细胞松弛素 B 诱导获得的膜囊泡(CIMV);DC 疫苗——使用相同脂质体将总肿瘤来源 RNA 负载至小鼠 DC;以及脂质体疫苗——总肿瘤来源 RNA 与脂质体 L 或 ML 的脂质复合物。CIMV 疫苗和 DC 疫苗无肝毒性,皮下接种后表现出相当的能力,可在体内刺激高效抗肿瘤 CTL,而脂质体疫苗诱导 CTL 的能力弱 25%。尽管如此,不同类型疫苗的抗肿瘤效率相似:无论疫苗类型如何,肿瘤结节大小和肝转移数量均显著减少。
值得注意的是,加强接种并未提高本研究中疫苗的整体抗肿瘤疗效。与基于脂质体的疫苗相比,CIMV 疫苗和 DC 疫苗更有效地降低肿瘤细胞有丝分裂活性并诱导其凋亡,刺激中性粒细胞炎症浸润在肿瘤组织中积聚,并对脾脏和胸腺具有更明显的免疫调节活性。给予基于 CIMV、DC 和脂质体的疫苗后,导致 Th1/Th17 细胞活化,以及正向免疫检查点 4-1BBL 的诱导和抑制性免疫检查点的下调,其顺序为 PD-1 >>> TIGIT > CTLA4 > TIM3。
我们证明,基于无细胞 CIMV 的疫苗在体内肿瘤模型中表现出优越的抗肿瘤和抗转移活性。所获得的结果可作为开发肿瘤免疫治疗新策略的基础。
Cell-free antitumor vaccines represent a promising approach to immunotherapy of cancer.
Here, we compare the antitumor potential of cell-free vaccines based on microvesicles derived from dendritic cells (DCs) with DC- and cationic-liposome-based vaccines using a murine model of drug-resistant lymphosarcoma RLS40 in vivo. The vaccines were the following: microvesicle vaccines—cytochalasin B-induced membrane vesicles (CIMVs) obtained from DCs loaded with total tumor RNA using cholesterol/spermine-containing cationic liposomes L or mannosylated liposomes ML; DC vaccines—murine DCs loaded with total tumor-derived RNA using the same liposomes; and liposomal vaccines—lipoplexes of total tumor-derived RNA with liposomes L or ML.
Being non-hepatotoxic, CIMV- and DC-based vaccines administered subcutaneously exhibited comparable potential to stimulate highly efficient antitumor CTLs in vivo, whereas liposomal vaccines were 25% weaker CTL inducers. Nevertheless, the antitumor efficiencies of the different types of the vaccines were similar: sizes of tumor nodes and the number of liver metastases were significantly decreased, regardless of the vaccine type.
Notably, the booster vaccination did not improve the overall antitumor efficacy of the vaccines under the study. CIMV- and DC- based vaccines more efficiently than liposome-based ones decreased mitotic activity of tumor cells and induced their apoptosis, stimulated accumulation of neutrophil inflammatory infiltration in tumor tissue, and had a more pronounced immunomodulatory activity toward the spleen and thymus.
Administration of CIMV-, DC-, and liposome-based vaccines resulted in activation of Th1/Th17 cells as well as the induction of positive immune checkpoint 4-1BBL and downregulation of suppressive immune checkpoints in a raw PD-1 >>> TIGIT > CTLA4 > TIM3.
We demonstrated that cell-free CIMV-based vaccines exhibited superior antitumor and antimetastatic activity in a tumor model in vivo. The obtained results can be considered as the basis for developing novel strategies for oncoimmunotherapy.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。