← 返回

儿童亚专科医师对噬血细胞性淋巴组织细胞增生症/巨噬细胞活化综合征诊断方法和治疗实践的差异

英文原题:Variation of Diagnostic Approaches and Treatment Practices for Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis/Macrophage Activation Syndrome Among Pediatric Subspecialists.

查看英文原题

Variation of Diagnostic Approaches and Treatment Practices for Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis/Macrophage Activation Syndrome Among Pediatric Subspecialists.

PubMed 2022/10/31(内容时间) J Pediatr Q1 · IF 3.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

目前 HLH/MAS 的会诊模式、诊断检查和治疗方法因专科而异,凸显了标准化管理算法和机构性多学科 HLH/MAS 团队的必要性。

研究思路结论见上方概要

评估美国儿科机构中各类亚专科医生的诊断和治疗实践。

我们采用基于网络的调查,评估了来自不同儿科亚专科、负责诊治儿童噬血细胞性淋巴组织细胞增生症(HLH)/巨噬细胞活化综合征(MAS)患者的提供者在咨询、诊断和治疗方面的偏好。调查领域包括人口统计学资料、提供者的培训水平和专业、在HLH/MAS诊断和治疗方面的经验和熟练程度,以及机构对HLH/MAS诊断和管理的方法。参与者还被给予2个病例情景:一个描述EB病毒相关HLH,另一个描述伴有MAS的潜在风湿性疾病。

在263名受访者中,分别有23%、29%、39%和7%的人自认为是血液学/肿瘤学、风湿病学、普通儿科/重症监护/住院医师以及过敏/免疫学专业。对于EB病毒/HLH,除风湿病学家外,大多数受访者首选血液学/肿瘤学作为第一会诊科室,而风湿病学家中仅有47%同意这一选择。对于MAS,来自所有专科的受访者中有92%倾向于风湿病学会诊。首选的诊断检查因亚专科而异,血液学/肿瘤学比风湿病学更倾向于安排感染相关检查、NK 细胞功能、可溶性白细胞介素-2受体、骨髓活检和基因检测。一线治疗也有所不同,血液学/肿瘤学倾向于地塞米松和依托泊苷,而风湿病学更常倾向于甲泼尼龙和阿那白滞素。一半的受访者不知道所在机构关于HLH/MAS诊断和治疗的流程方案。大多数(85.6%)支持制定HLH/MAS的治疗流程,90%支持多学科协作方式。

展开英文摘要原文

To assess the diagnostic and treatment practices among a variety of subspecialists at pediatric institutions in the US. STUDY DESIGN: Using a web-based survey, we assessed the consultation, diagnostic, and treatment preferences of providers from the different pediatric subspecialties who care for pediatric patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)/macrophage activating syndrome (MAS). Domains included demographics, provider training level and specialty, experience and comfort level with the diagnosis and treatment of HLH/MAS, and institutional approaches toward the diagnosis and management of HLH/MAS. Participants also were given 2 case scenarios: one describing Epstein-Barr virus-associated HLH and another describing an underlying rheumatologic condition with MAS.

Of 263 respondents, 23%, 29%, 39%, and 7% identified as hematology/oncology, rheumatology, general pediatrics/critical care/hospitalist, and allergy/immunology, respectively. For Epstein-Barr virus/HLH, hematology/oncology was the preferred first consultant by most respondents other than rheumatologists, of whom only 47% agreed. For MAS, 92% of respondents from all specialties favored a rheumatology consultation. Preferred diagnostic tests varied by subspecialty, with hematology/oncology more likely than rheumatology to order an infectious workup, natural killer cell function, soluble interleukin-2 receptor, bone marrow biopsy, and genetic testing. First-line therapy also varied, with hematology/oncology preferring dexamethasone and etoposide and rheumatology more often preferring methylprednisolone and anakinra. One-half of respondents were unaware of institutional algorithms for diagnosis and treatment of HLH/MAS. Most (85.6%) favored the development of treatment algorithms for HLH/MAS, and 90% supported a multidisciplinary approach.

Current consulting patterns, diagnostic workup, and treatment approaches of HLH/MAS vary by specialty, highlighting the need for standardized management algorithms and institutional multidisciplinary HLH/MAS teams.

论文信息

作者
Carter-Febres M、Lozano-Chinga M、Thomsen W、Treemarcki EB、James KE、Fluchel M
单位
Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH; Division of Hematology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; University of Cincinnati-College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH; University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT. Electronic address: maria.carterfebres@cchmc.org.United States
期刊
The Journal of pediatrics2023 Apr
原文标识
PubMed 36328191 · DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.10.022