CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Comparable outcomes in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Pretransplant minimal residual disease-negative complete remission following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy versus chemotherapy.
Comparable outcomes in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Pretransplant minimal residual disease-negative complete remission following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy versus chemotherapy.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
我们的结果表明,接受 CAR-T 治疗后进行单倍体 HSCT 的 R/R B-ALL 患者,其结局与基于化疗后达到 MRD 阴性 CR1 并接受移植的患者相当,且未增加移植相关死亡和毒性的风险。
嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞(CAR-T)疗法序贯单倍体造血干细胞移植(haplo-HSCT)可显著改善难治/复发性(R/R)B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)患者的长期生存。
我们进行了一项平行比较,分析了2016年1月至2021年8月期间,168例B-ALL患者在通过CAR-T 治疗(n = 28)或化疗(n = 140)达到微小残留病(MRD)阴性完全缓解(CR)后接受单倍体HSCT的移植结局。我们进一步将化疗组分为首次CR组(chemo+CR1,n = 118)和第二次或以上CR组(chemo+CR2,n = 22)。
中位随访时间为31.0个月,CAR-T 组和化疗组的2年总生存期(OS)率、无白血病生存(LFS)率、非复发死亡(NRM)率和复发率均无显著差异(OS,87.9% vs. 71.5%;LFS,72.0% vs. 66.8%;NRM,3.9% vs. 13.7%;复发,24.1% vs. 19.4%)。多因素分析证实,化疗后移植时处于CR2是与较差OS(风险比(HR)4.22 [95% CI,1.34-13.293],p = 0.014)和LFS(HR 2.57 [95% CI,1.041-6.343],p = 0.041)相关的独立危险因素。CAR-T 组2年OS和LFS概率与化疗+CR1组相当,但显著高于化疗+CR2组(OS,87.9% vs. 37.8%,p = 0.007;LFS,72.0% vs. 41.7%,p = 0.043)。三组之间NRM发生率未见显著差异。
We performed a parallel comparison of transplant outcomes in 168 B-ALL patients undergoing haplo-HSCT after achieving minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remission (CR) from CAR-T therapy (n = 28) or chemotherapy (n = 140) between January 2016 and August 2021. We further divided the chemotherapy group into the first CR group (chemo+CR1, n = 118) and a second or more CR group (chemo+ CR2, n = 22).
With a median follow-up period of 31.0 months, the 2-year overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse rates in the CAR-T and chemotherapy groups did not differ significantly (OS, 87.9% vs. 71.5 %; LFS, 72.0% vs. 66.8%; NRM, 3.9% vs. 13.7%; relapse, 24.1% vs. 19.4%). Multivariate analysis confirmed that CR2 at transplantation following chemotherapy was an independent risk factor associated with poor OS (hazard ratio (HR) 4.22 [95% CI, 1.34-13.293], p = 0.014) and LFS (HR 2.57 [95% CI, 1.041-6.343], p = 0.041). The probabilities of OS and LFS at 2 years in the CAR-T group were comparable to those in the chemo+CR1 group but significantly higher than those in the chemo+ CR2 group (OS, 87.9% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.007; LFS, 72.0% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.043). No significant differences in the incidences of NRM were noted among the three groups.
Our results demonstrated that patients with R/R B-ALL receiving haplo-HSCT after CAR-T therapy achieved comparable outcomes to patients transplanted post-chemotherapy-based MRD-negative CR1, without increased risk of transplant-related mortality and toxicity.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。