CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:The efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T cells in digestive system cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T cells in digestive system cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CAR-T 细胞疗法对 DSCs 患者总体有益,尽管 ORR 仍然较差。需要采用更特异性的肿瘤抗原、共刺激域和慢病毒载体进行改造构建,以获得更好的 CAR-T 细胞疗法抗肿瘤反应。需要生存数据信息以进行更全面的分析。
作为血液系统恶性肿瘤的成功治疗方法,CAR-T 细胞(CAR-T 细胞)已被扩展到实体瘤以证明其安全性和有效性,特别是对于消化系统癌症(DSC)。用于不同类型DSC的各种CAR-T 细胞构建体导致异质性反应。因此,我们旨在系统总结CAR-T 细胞治疗DSC的临床反应,并研究与结局异质性相关的因素。
从PubMed、Cochrane、Embase、Web of Science数据库中筛选2020年10月1日之前发表的关于CAR-T 细胞治疗DSC患者的临床研究。使用“CAR-T cell”、“solid tumor”及其同义词构建检索策略。排除重复文献、综述、非英文文献、与临床研究无关的文章或CAR-T 细胞用于消化道肿瘤的文章。采用卫生经济学研究所(IHE)偏倚风险工具对纳入研究进行方法学质量评估。采用逆方差法进行数据合并和亚组分析,以明确异质性来源。通过漏斗图和Egger检验检查发表偏倚。
共纳入12项研究,偏倚风险评估以Review Manager 5.3绘制的图形展示。汇总的总体缓解率(ORR)为2%(95% CI:0-6%),临床获益率(CBR)为42%(95% CI:24-61%)。根据亚组分析,共刺激(P=0.0449)、淋巴细胞清除(P=0.0002)、CAR-T 细胞的持续性(P=0.0443)和转导方法(P=0.0165)是导致异质性的因素。在不良反应方面,发热最为常见(35%,95% CI:24-61%)。未发现发表偏倚,且在逐一剔除12项研究中的任意一项时,主要结果在轻微波动范围内保持稳健。
As a successful treatment for hematological malignancy, chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) have been expanded to solid tumors to demonstrate their safety and efficacy, especially for digestive system cancer (DSC). Various CAR-T cell constructs used in different types of DSCs result in heterogeneous responses. Thus, we aimed to systematically summarize the clinical response of DSCs treated with CAR-T cells and investigate factors associated with heterogeneity in outcomes.
Clinical studies of DSC patients treated with CAR-T cell therapy were selected from the PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science databases before October 1, 2020. "CAR-T cell", "solid tumor" and their synonymous terms were used to construct the search strategy. Duplicates, reviews, non-English literature, articles not related to clinical studies or CAR-T cells used for digestive tumors were excluded. The included studies were assessed by the Institute of Health Economics (IHE) risk of bias tool to check the methodological quality. The inverse variance method was used to perform data pooling and subgroup analysis to clarify the causes of heterogeneity. Publication bias was examined by funnel plots and Egger's test.
Twelve studies were included, and the risk of bias evaluation was demonstrated as plots using Review Manager 5.3. The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 2% (95% CI: 0-6%), and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 42% (95% CI: 24-61%). According to subgroup analysis, costimulation (P=0.0449), lymphodepletion (P=0.0002), persistence of CAR-T cells (P=0.0443) and transduction method (P=0.0165) were factors contributing to heterogeneity. For adverse effects, pyrexia was the most frequent (35%, 95% CI: 24-61%). No publication bias was found, and the major results were robust within a slight fluctuation for each removal of one of the 12 studies. DISCUSSION: CAR-T cell therapy is generally beneficial for patients with DSCs though the ORR was still poor. Modified construction with more specific tumor antigens, costimulatory domain and lentiviral vectors is necessary to obtain a better antitumor response of CAR-T cell therapy. Information of survival data are needed for a more comprehensive analysis.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。