CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Statistical Considerations for Analyses of Time-To-Event Endpoints in Oncology Clinical Trials: Illustrations with CAR-T Immunotherapy Studies.
Statistical Considerations for Analyses of Time-To-Event Endpoints in Oncology Clinical Trials: Illustrations with CAR-T Immunotherapy Studies.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CAR-T 治疗是癌症免疫学领域的重要进展,近年来受到广泛关注。CAR-T 研究分析了许多与复发、疾病进展和缓解有关的时间事件(TTE)终点以评估疗效。即使结局名称相同(如无进展生存期),TTE终点的定义也并不总是一致,常由分析决策导致,例如复合终点纳入哪些事件、分析中如何处理删失或竞争风险。移植等后续治疗很常见,但不同研究中的处理方式不一。研究常采用标准生存分析方法分析TTE,却未必充分考虑所选分析方法的假设。本文指出CAR-T 及其他肿瘤学研究中TTE分析的两个重要问题:竞争风险的处理,以及评估输注后随时间变化的暴露与TTE结局之间的关联。
我们回顾现有分析方法,包括累计发生函数和竞争风险回归模型,以及分析输注后暴露的里程碑分析和时变协变量分析。我们阐明不同分析方法回答的科学问题,并使用多项已发表CAR-T 研究的数据说明,采用不恰当的方法可能得出不同结果。文中还提供了在常见统计软件中实现这些方法的代码。
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is an exciting development in the field of cancer immunology and has received a lot of interest in recent years. Many time-to-event (TTE) endpoints related to relapse, disease progression, and remission are analyzed in CAR-T studies to assess treatment efficacy. Definitions of these TTE endpoints are not always consistent, even for the same outcomes (e. g.
, progression-free survival), which often stems from analysis choices regarding which events to consider as part of the composite endpoint, censoring or competing risk in the analysis. Subsequent therapies such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are common but are not treated the same in different studies. Standard survival analysis methods are commonly applied to TTE analyses but often without full consideration of the assumptions inherent in the chosen analysis.
We highlight two important issues of TTE analysis that arise in CAR-T studies, as well as in other settings in oncology: the handling of competing risks and assessing the association between a time-varying (post-infusion) exposure and the TTE outcome.
We review existing analytical methods, including the cumulative incidence function and regression models for analysis of competing risks, and landmark and time-varying covariate analysis for analysis of post-infusion exposures.
We clarify the scientific questions that the different analytical approaches address and illustrate how the application of an inappropriate method could lead to different results using data from multiple published CAR-T studies. Codes for implementing these methods in standard statistical software are provided.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。