← 返回

乳腺癌手术中的免疫反应。不同麻醉技术的比较性和前瞻性研究

英文原题:Immune response in breast cancer surgery. A comparative and prospective study of different anesthetic techniques.

查看英文原题

Immune response in breast cancer surgery. A comparative and prospective study of different anesthetic techniques.

PubMed 2022/06/24(内容时间) Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed) Q3 · IF 1.3(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

在乳腺癌手术中,将胸壁筋膜间阻滞加入全身麻醉,与仅采用全身麻醉作为唯一麻醉技术相比,并未在炎症反应或免疫抑制方面显示出显著差异。筋膜间阻滞组似乎有免疫抑制较轻的趋势。

研究思路结论见上方概要

乳腺癌高死亡率的主要原因是局部复发和转移,尽管手术是首选治疗方式。手术室中使用的麻醉可以决定免疫反应。

一项前瞻性、比较性、非随机研究在我院经医院机构审查委员会批准后,对接受乳腺癌手术的患者进行。患者被分为两组:A组接受丙泊酚和阿片类药物的全身麻醉。B组除全身麻醉外,所有患者均实施三种筋膜间阻滞(Pec I、Pec II和BRILMA)。采集三次血样:1)麻醉诱导前;2)手术结束后两小时;3)术后24-48小时。每次检测白细胞、CD3、CD4、CD8和NK 细胞。

共纳入103例患者。59例(A组)接受全身麻醉,54例(B组)接受全身麻醉联合筋膜间阻滞。在基线特征方面,接受全身麻醉组的年龄显著更高,而接受筋膜间阻滞组行乳房切除术更为常见。我们观察到术后白细胞水平升高,随后恢复至接近基线水平。另一方面,观察到免疫反应降低,同样在术后48小时恢复至先前水平。A组和B组获得相似结果,激素受体亚组(HER+、PR和/或ER+)亦如此。

展开英文摘要原文

A prospective, comparative and non- randomised study in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery was conducted in our hospital after obtaining approval from the Hospital's Institutional Review Board. Patients were divided in two groups: Group A received general anesthesia with propofol and opioids. Group B, in addition to general anesthesia, three interfascial blocks (Pec I, Pec II and BRILMA) were performed in all patients. Three blood samples were taken 1) previous anesthetic induction; 2) two hours after the end of the surgery and 3) 24-48 h after surgery. Leukocytes, CD3, CD4, CD8 and Natural Killer cells were determined at each time.

103 patients were included. 59 (group A) received general anesthesia and 54 (group B) general anesthesia and interfascial blocks. Regarding baseline characteristics, age was significantly higher in the group that received general anesthesia and mastectomy was more frequent in the group that received interfascial blocks. We observed after surgery an increase in leukocytes level that returns close to baseline levels. On the other hand, a reduction in the immune response was observed that also returns to the previous level 48 h after surgery. Group A and B get similar results and also subgroups of hormonal receptors (HER+, PR and/or ER+).

Interfascial blocks in chest wall added to general anesthesia in breast cancer surgery has not shown a significant difference in the inflammatory response or immunological depression compared to general anesthesia as the only anesthetic technique. It seems to trend less immunological depression in the interfascial block group.

论文信息

作者
Martín Ventura S、García Molina C、Ortigosa Solórzano E、García Vela JA、Thuissard-Vasallo IJ、Lorente Ruifernández MT、Gallego Gil P、Martín Rubio I
单位
Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: smartinventura@gmail.com.Spain
文献类型
随机对照试验
期刊
Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion2022 Jun-Jul
原文标识
PubMed 35760691 · DOI 10.1016/j.redare.2021.06.002