一种用于克服非小细胞肺癌治疗中抗原异质性的多靶向 CAR-T 细胞平台
A Multi-Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Platform to Overcome Antigen Heterogeneity in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
这些发现支持采用多靶点CAR-T 策略来应对NSCLC及可能其他实体瘤中的抗原异质性。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expression in Cytological and Surgical Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Specimens in Association with EGFR Mutation and Overall Survival: A Single-Institution Experience.
Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expression in Cytological and Surgical Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Specimens in Association with EGFR Mutation and Overall Survival: A Single-Institution Experience.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
由于文献报道的阳性率范围差异很大,我们无法就所观察到的 PD-L1 阳性率是高还是低得出结论。
评估晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中程序性细胞死亡配体 1(PD-L1)的表达,并分析驱动突变与生存结局之间的关系。
这项回顾性研究纳入 122 例晚期 NSCLC 患者。患者经细胞学检查和活检或切除标本的组织病理分析确诊,且至少接受过 1 项分子分析。对肿瘤和TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)中的 PD-L1 表达进行评分,并与年龄、性别、部位、活检方法、肿瘤亚型、驱动突变状态及总生存期数据进行比较。
PD-L1 阳性与年龄、性别、部位、组织学模式或样本病理诊断类型之间均无统计学显著差异。若将 PD-L1 免疫组化评估阈值设为 1% 和 50%,阳性率分别为 19.7% 和 7.4%。
文献报道的阳性率范围很广,因此无法判断本研究观察到的 PD-L1 阳性率偏高还是偏低。需要开展比较研究,并统一检测技术、抗体克隆、阈值和分期。EGFR 突变人群与 PD-L1 阳性率呈负相关。总生存期方面,PD-L1 阳性、TIL 存在与否及 EGFR 突变状态之间未发现关联。
The aim of this study was to evaluate programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and the relationship between driver mutations and survival analysis in advanced-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 122 advanced-stage NSCLC patients were included in this retrospective study. The patients were diagnosed based on cytological examination and histopathological analysis of biopsy or resection material that had undergone at least 1 molecular analysis. The expression of PD-L1 in tumors and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) was scored and compared with age, sex, organ, biopsy method, tumor subtype, driver mutation status, and overall survival data.
There was no statistically significant difference between PD-L1-positivity and age, gender, location, pattern, or pathological diagnosis of the type of sample. When the threshold value for PD-L1 IHC evaluation was accepted as 1% and 50%, the rate of positivity was 19.7% and 7.4%, respectively.
Since there is a wide range of positivity rates reported in the literature, we could not reach a conclusion as to whether the PD-L1-positivity rate we observed was high or low. There is a need for comparative studies where the technique, clones, threshold values, and phases are homogenized. There is an inverse correlation between the EGFR-mutant population and PD-L1 positivity. In terms of overall survival, no relationship was found between PD-L1 positivity, the presence of TIL, and EGFR mutation status.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。