← 返回

从新加坡医疗系统视角对 tisagenlecleucel 治疗复发/难治性 B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病儿童及年轻成人患者的成本效果与预算影响分析

英文原题:Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analyses of Tisagenlecleucel in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia from the Singapore Healthcare System Perspective.

查看英文原题

Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analyses of Tisagenlecleucel in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia from the Singapore Healthcare System Perspective.

PubMed 2022/05/03(内容时间) Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Q2 · IF 2.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

Tisagenlecleucel 可能是一种具有成本效益的治疗选择,在治疗至少 2 线既往治疗失败的 r/r ALL 患者时,预算影响有限。

研究思路结论见上方概要

复发/难治性(r/r)急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的儿童和年轻成人因治疗选择无效而生存率低。新批准的CAR-T 细胞疗法tisagenlecleucel已证明可改善生存,但前期成本高昂。本研究旨在从新加坡医疗体系角度评估tisagenlecleucel与挽救性化疗方案(SCR)或blinatumomab(BLN)相比,用于治疗儿童和年轻成人复发/难治性B细胞ALL患者的成本效果和预算影响。

构建了一个三健康状态分区生存模型,用于分析tisagenlecleucel与SCR/BLN联合或不联合异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)在终生时间范围内的成本效果。tisagenlecleucel、SCR和BLN的临床疗效分别基于ELIANA、ENSIGN和B2101J试验、von Stackelberg等人2011年的研究以及MT103-205的汇总数据。考虑了从治疗前到终末期护理的医疗费用,包括治疗、副作用、随访、后续allo-HSCT和复发。增量成本效果比(ICERs)估计为每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本。此外,还估计了tisagenlecleucel在新加坡引入的财务影响,比较了当前治疗情景(无tisagenlecleucel)与未来情景(有tisagenlecleucel)在5年内的差异。

在基础案例分析中,tisagenlecleucel治疗显示出成本效益,其ICER为每QALY S$45,840(US$34,762)(对比SCR)和每QALY S$51,978(US$39,315)(对比BLN)。预计初始5年的年度预算范围为S$477,857(US$361,438)至S$1.4百万(US$1.05百万)。

展开英文摘要原文

Children and young adults with relapsed or refractory (r/r) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have poor survival due to ineffective therapy options. The newly approved chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, tisagenlecleucel, has demonstrated improved survival but at a high up-front cost. The study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of tisagenlecleucel versus salvage chemotherapy regimen (SCR) or blinatumomab (BLN) for the treatment of pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL from the Singapore healthcare system perspective.

A three-health state partitioned survival model was constructed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of tisagenlecleucel vs SCR/BLN with/without allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) over a lifetime period. Clinical efficacy for tisagenlecleucel, SCR and BLN were based on pooled data from ELIANA, ENSIGN and B2101J trials, the study by von Stackelberg et al 2011, and MT103-205 respectively. Medical costs from pre-treatment until terminal care, including treatment, side effects, follow-up, subsequent allo-HSCT and relapse, were considered. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated as the incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain. Additionally, the financial impact of tisagenlecleucel introduction in Singapore was estimated, comparing the present treatment scenario (without tisagenlecleucel) with a future scenario (with tisagenlecleucel), over 5 years.

In the base-case analysis, tisagenlecleucel treatment demonstrated cost-effectiveness with an ICER of S$45,840 (US$34,762) per QALY (vs SCR) and S$51,978 (US$39,315) per QALY (vs BLN). The estimated budget ranges from S$477,857 (US$361,438) to S$1.4 million (US$1.05 million) annually for the initial 5 years.

Tisagenlecleucel is likely to be a cost-effective treatment option with limited budget implications while treating r/r ALL patients who have failed at least 2 lines of prior therapies.

论文信息

作者
Wang XJ、Wang YH、Ong MJC、Gkitzia C、Soh SY、Hwang WYK
第一作者单位
Novartis Singapore Pte Ltd, Singapore.Singapore
通讯作者单位
National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.Singapore
期刊
ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2022
原文标识
PubMed 35535300 · DOI 10.2147/CEOR.S355557