← 返回

原发 TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)在当代黑色素瘤队列中的预后意义

英文原题:Prognostic Significance of Primary Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in a Contemporary Melanoma Cohort.

查看英文原题

Prognostic Significance of Primary Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in a Contemporary Melanoma Cohort.

PubMed 2022/03/17(内容时间) Ann Surg Oncol Q1 · IF 3.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

在当代黑色素瘤时代,原发性 TILs 的预后意义似乎较为复杂。有必要进一步开展研究,以表征 TILs 的表型及其与区域转移和对 ICB 治疗反应性的关联。

研究思路结论见上方概要

TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TILs)对当代黑色素瘤患者预后及治疗效果的影响仍缺乏充分描述。

连续纳入2006年至2019年在单一机构因厚度≥1 mm的皮肤黑色素瘤接受扩大切除和前哨淋巴结活检的患者。根据原发肿瘤TIL状态将患者分为活跃型(bTILs)、非活跃型(nbTILs)或缺失型(aTILs)。采用多变量分析评估患者因素与结局之间的关联。

在评估的1017例患者中,846例(83.2%)具有原发性TILs [nbTILs(n = 759,89.7%)和bTILs(n = 87,10.3%)]。在多变量分析中,与无TILs的患者相比,具有任何类型TILs的患者消退率更高[比值比(OR),1.86;p = 0.016],肢端雀斑样组织学发生率更低(OR,0.22;p < 0.001),SLN阳性率更低(OR,0.64;p = 0.042)。多变量分析发现疾病特异性生存与bTILs [风险比(HR),1.04;p = 0.927]或nbTILs(HR,0.89;p = 0.683)之间无关联。发现bTILs与无复发生存(RFS)优势之间存在关联[bTILs(HR 0.46;p = 0.047),nbTILs(HR 0.71;p = 0.088)],5年RFS率分别为bTILs 84%、nbTILs 71.8%和aTILs 68.4%(p = 0.044)。对于114例未接受过免疫检查点阻断(ICB)治疗且出现复发后接受ICB治疗的患者,未观察到无进展生存期与bTILs(HR,0.64;p = 0.482)或nbTILs(HR,0.58;p = 0.176)之间的关联。

展开英文摘要原文

The prognostic impact of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) on outcomes and treatment efficacy for patients with melanoma in the contemporary era remains poorly characterized.

Consecutive patients who underwent wide excision and sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma 1 mm thick or thicker at a single institution were identified (2006-2019). The patients were stratified based on primary tumor TIL status as brisk (bTILs), non-brisk (nbTILs), or absent (aTILs). Associations between patient factors and outcomes were analyzed using multivariable analysis.

Of the 1017 patients evaluated, 846 (83.2 %) had primary TILs [nbTILs (n = 759, 89.7 %) and bTILs (n = 87, 10.3 %)]. In the multivariable analysis, the patients with any type of TILs had higher rates of regression [odds ratio (OR), 1.86; p = 0.016], lower rates of acral lentiginous histology (OR, 0.22; p < 0.001), and lower rates of SLN positivity (OR, 0.64; p = 0.042) than those without TILs. The multivariable analysis found no association between disease-specific survival and bTILs [hazard ratio (HR), 1.04; p = 0.927] or nbTILs (HR, 0.89; p = 0.683). An association was found between bTILs and recurrence-free survival (RFS) advantage [bTILs (HR 0.46; p = 0.047), nbTILs (HR 0.71; p = 0.088)], with 5-year RFS rates of 84 % for bTILs, 71.8 % for nbTILs, and 68.4 % for aTILs (p = 0.044). For the 114 immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)-na ve patients who experienced a recurrence treated with ICB therapy, no association was observed between progression-free survival and bTILs (HR, 0.64; p = 0.482) or nbTILs (HR, 0.58; p = 0.176).

The prognostic significance of primary TILs in the contemporary melanoma era appears complex. Further studies characterizing the phenotype of TILs and their association with regional metastasis and responsiveness to ICB therapy are warranted.

论文信息

作者
Straker RJ 3rd、Krupp K、Sharon CE、Thaler AS、Kelly NJ、Chu EY、Elder DE、Xu X
单位
Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Richard.straker@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.United States
期刊
Annals of surgical oncology2022 Aug
原文标识
PubMed 35301610 · DOI 10.1245/s10434-022-11478-4