免疫检查点阻断通过扩增效应 CD8⁺ T 细胞克隆增强淋巴细胞清除性化疗诱导的抗肿瘤免疫
Immune Checkpoint Blockade Augments Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy-Induced Antitumor Immunity by Expanding Effector CD8+ T-cell Clones.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Is the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predictive of outcomes in patients with melanoma?
Is the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predictive of outcomes in patients with melanoma?
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
TIL 是有利的标志物,因为其存在显著预测 SLN 阴性,而 TIL 缺失可能是 SLN 阳性患者生存较差的预后标志物,但在 SLN 阴性患者中则不然。当不考虑 SLN 状态时,TIL 也可作为生存的预后标志物。
TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TILs)在黑色素瘤中的意义存在争议。本文介绍了一项多中心、回顾性研究,评估TILs的预测和预后价值。
前哨淋巴结工作组数据库查询了1993年至2018年间已知TIL数据的病例。TIL分为缺失或存在,存在包括非活跃(NB)、活跃(B)和存在但未指定TIL水平。临床病理因素与TIL、前哨淋巴结(SLN)状态和黑色素瘤特异性生存(MSS)相关。
总体共纳入3203例患者。中位厚度为1.5 mm,469例发生SLN转移。2458例(76.7%)存在TILs,其中NB、B和未指定TILs分别为1691例(68.8%)、691例(28.1%)和76例(3.1%)。多变量分析显示,TILs的存在显著预测SLN活检阴性(P < .05)。中位随访时间为25.2个月。有TILs病例的MSS显著优于无TILs病例(P < .001)。根据多变量分析,年龄、性别、厚度、核分裂率、溃疡、淋巴血管侵犯和SLN状态对MSS具有显著预后意义(所有P值 < .05)。尽管TILs对MSS无预后意义,但当使用多重插补并排除SLN状态时,TILs的存在显著预示MSS改善(风险比,0.78;95%置信区间,0.64-0.95;P = .0154)。
The significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in melanoma is debated. This article presents a multicenter, retrospective study assessing the predictive and prognostic value of TILs.
The Sentinel Lymph Node Working Group database was queried from 1993 to 2018 for cases with known TIL data. TILs were categorized as absent or present, which included nonbrisk (NB), brisk (B), and present but unspecified TIL levels. Clinicopathologic factors were correlated with TILs, sentinel lymph node (SLN) status, and melanoma-specific survival (MSS).
Overall, 3203 patients were included. The median thickness was 1.5 mm, and 469 cases had SLN metastases. TILs were present in 2458 cases (76.7%), with NB, B, and unspecified TILs seen in 1691 (68.8%), 691 (28.1%), and 76 (3.1%), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that the presence of TILs significantly predicted a negative SLN biopsy (P < .05). The median follow-up was 25.2 months. MSS was significantly better for cases with TILs than cases without TILs (P < .001). According to multivariable analysis, age, gender, thickness, mitotic rate, ulceration, lymphovascular invasion, and SLN status were significantly prognostic of MSS (all P values < .05). Although TILs were not prognostic of MSS, when multiple imputation was used and the SLN status was excluded, the presence of TILs was significantly prognostic of improved MSS (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.95; P = .0154).
TILs are a favorable marker because their presence significantly predicts a negative SLN, and the absence of TILs may be a prognostic marker of worse survival in patients with a positive SLN but not a negative SLN. TILs may also serve as a prognostic marker of survival when the SLN status is not considered.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。