← 返回

FACS 与 PCR 检测 BCMA-CAR-T 细胞的比较

英文原题:Comparison of FACS and PCR for Detection of BCMA-CAR-T Cells.

查看英文原题

Comparison of FACS and PCR for Detection of BCMA-CAR-T Cells.

PubMed 2022/01/14(内容时间) Int J Mol Sci Q1 · IF 5.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T细胞疗法已广泛用于治疗对化疗、抗体或干细胞移植复发或难治的患者。多发性骨髓瘤仍是一种无法治愈的疾病。靶向BCMA(B细胞成熟抗原)的CAR-T 细胞疗法目前正在革新这些患者的治疗。为了监测和改善治疗结果,非常需要能够在人外周血中检测CAR-T 细胞的方法。

在本研究中,比较了三种不同的检测试剂用于通过流式细胞术染色BCMA-CAR-T 细胞。此外,建立了检测BCMA-CAR-T 细胞的定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)。通过应用BCMA-CAR-T 细胞的细胞滴定实验,对两种方法进行了头对头比较。在流式细胞术分析中,本研究中使用的检测试剂均能以相似水平检测BCMA-CAR-T 细胞。假阳性背景染色的结果差异如下(标准差):对照中使用的BCMA检测试剂显示背景染色为0.04%(0.02%),PE标记的人BCMA肽为0.25%(0.06%),多克隆抗人IgG抗体为7.2%(9.2%)。qPCR和流式细胞术在检测低至0.4%浓度的BCMA-CAR-T 细胞方面能力相似。qPCR甚至可以检测更低浓度(0.02-0.01%)。

总之,BCMA-CAR-T 细胞监测可通过流式细胞术和qPCR可靠进行。在流式细胞术中,应优先选择背景染色低的试剂。

展开英文摘要原文

Chimeric-antigen-receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy is already widely used to treat patients who are relapsed or refractory to chemotherapy, antibodies, or stem-cell transplantation. Multiple myeloma still constitutes an incurable disease.

CAR-T-cell therapy that targets BCMA (B-cell maturation antigen) is currently revolutionizing the treatment of those patients. To monitor and improve treatment outcomes, methods to detect CAR-T cells in human peripheral blood are highly desirable. In this study, three different detection reagents for staining BCMA-CAR-T cells by flow cytometry were compared.

Moreover, a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to detect BCMA-CAR-T cells was established. By applying a cell-titration experiment of BCMA-CAR-T cells, both methods were compared head-to-head. In flow-cytometric analysis, the detection reagents used in this study could all detect BCMA-CAR-T cells at a similar level. The results of false-positive background staining differed as follows (standard deviation): the BCMA-detection reagent used on the control revealed a background staining of 0.

04% ( 0. 02%), for the PE-labeled human BCMA peptide it was 0. 25% ( 0. 06%) and for the polyclonal anti-human IgG antibody it was 7. 2% ( 9. 2%). The ability to detect BCMA-CAR-T cells down to a concentration of 0. 4% was similar for qPCR and flow cytometry. The qPCR could detect even lower concentrations (0. 02-0. 01%). In summary, BCMA-CAR-T-cell monitoring can be reliably performed by both flow cytometry and qPCR. In flow cytometry, reagents with low background staining should be preferred.

论文信息

作者
Reichman A、Kunz A、Joedicke JJ、Höpken UE、Keib A、Neuber B、Sedloev D、Wang L
单位
Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.Germany
期刊
International journal of molecular sciences2022 Jan 14
原文标识
PubMed 35055086 · DOI 10.3390/ijms23020903