CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Antigen Receptor T Cells (CAR-T) Effectively Control Tumor Growth in a Colorectal Liver Metastasis Model.
Antigen Receptor T Cells (CAR-T) Effectively Control Tumor Growth in a Colorectal Liver Metastasis Model.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
细胞免疫治疗是实体瘤的一种新兴选择。我们的模型表明,RD 和 HPRD 改善了 CAR-T 向实体瘤的穿透,并改善了短期肿瘤控制。与 SD 相关的障碍可以通过 RD 技术克服,以最大化治疗递送,而 HPRD 可能进一步增强疗效而不增加毒性。
实体瘤的有效治疗需要多模式方法。在许多IV期肝病患者中,当前的治疗方法无法治愈。CAR-T 细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中取得成功后成为一种引人注目的选择,但这尚未转化至实体瘤。局限性包括递送不理想和间质液压力升高。我们开发了一种小鼠模型,以测试高压区域递送(HPRD)对肝转移(LM)的迁移和肿瘤反应的影响。
CAR-T 由CD45.1小鼠生成,并通过区域或全身递送(RD、SD)过继转移至荷LM的CD45.2小鼠。通过流式细胞术、肿瘤生物发光(TB,光子/秒 log 2 倍相对于基线)和肝功能检查(LFTs)评估 trafficking、肿瘤生长和毒性。
CAR-T 的RD在控制肿瘤生长方面比SD更有效,从治疗后第2-7天(PTD)起(P = 0.002)。HPRD导致CAR-T 穿透增加,相较于低压RD(LPRD,P = 0.004),抑制肿瘤增殖(P = 0.03),并在PTD17时趋向于改善长期控制(TB=3.7 versus 6.1,P = 0.47)。使用HPRD相较于LPRD未观察到LFT增加(AST/ALT P = 0.65/0.84),而RD组相较于SD组改善的LFTs提示更好的肿瘤控制(HPRD AST/ALT P = 0.04/0.04,LPRD AST/ALT P = 0.02/0.02)。
Effective treatment of solid tumors requires multi-modality approaches. In many patients with stage IV liver disease, current treatments are not curative. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) are an intriguing option following success in hematological malignancies, but this has not been translated to solid tumors. Limitations include sub-optimal delivery and elevated interstitial fluid pressures. We developed a murine model to test the impact of high-pressure regional delivery (HPRD) on trafficking to liver metastases (LM) and tumor response.
CAR-T were generated from CD45.1 mice and adoptively transferred into LM-bearing CD45.2 mice via regional or systemic delivery (RD, SD). Trafficking, tumor growth, and toxicity were evaluated with flow cytometry, tumor bioluminescence (TB, photons/sec log 2 -foldover baseline), and liver function tests (LFTs).
RD of CAR-T was more effective at controlling tumor growth versus SD from post-treatment days (PTD) 2-7 (P = 0.002). HPRD resulted in increased CAR-T penetration versus low-pressure RD (LPRD, P = 0.004), suppression of tumor proliferation (P = 0.03), and trended toward improved long-term control at PTD17 (TB=3.7 versus 6.1, P = 0.47). No LFT increase was noted utilizing HPRD versus LPRD (AST/ALT P = 0.65/0.84) while improved LFTs in RD versus SD groups suggested better tumor control (HPRD AST/ALT P = 0.04/0.04, LPRD AST/ALT P = 0.02/0.02).
Cellular immunotherapy is an emerging option for solid tumors. Our model suggests RD and HPRD improved CAR-T penetration into solid tumors with improved short-term tumor control. Barriers associated with SD can be overcome using RD techniques to maximize therapeutic delivery and HPRD may further augment efficacy without increased toxicity.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。