← 返回

高危髓系肿瘤患者接受序贯 FLAMSA 减强度预处理和异基因造血干细胞移植后过继免疫治疗的时间依赖性分析

英文原题:Time-dependent analysis of adoptive immunotherapy following sequential FLAMSA-reduced intensity conditioning and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk myeloid neoplasia.

查看英文原题

Time-dependent analysis of adoptive immunotherapy following sequential FLAMSA-reduced intensity conditioning and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk myeloid neoplasia.

PubMed 2021/12/23(内容时间) Eur J Haematol Q2 · IF 2.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

预防性供者淋巴细胞输注(DLI)是序贯FLAMSA-降低强度预处理(RIC)方案的一部分,用于通过异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)治愈高危髓系肿瘤。尽管DLI本身具有显著风险,但其预防性应用尚未以时间依赖性方式进行分析。2013年至2020年间,114例患者接受了FLAMSA-RIC HSCT。除对总生存期、无病生存期和移植物抗宿主无复发生存(OS、DFS、GRFS)进行Kaplan-Meier估计外,还在竞争风险模型中计算了复发和缓解期死亡的累积发生率。

此外,使用时间变化模型评估了预防性和抢先性DLI作为时间依赖性协变量对DFS的贡献(Simon-Makuch法,Mantel-Byar检验)。2年时,OS为45.2% [95% CI 36.7-55.7%],DFS为31.8% [95% CI 24-42.2%],GRFS为11.3 [95% CI 6.5-19.8]。当作为时间依赖性协变量考虑时,预防性和抢先性DLI均未显示对DFS的显著影响(Mantel-Byar,p = .3)。在将DLI作为时间依赖性协变量的竞争风险分析中,这一结果得到进一步证实。在高危队列中,预防性和抢先性DLI在时间变化模型中对生存的影响均未达到显著性。需要开展对照试验以探讨移植后免疫治疗方法的影响。

展开英文摘要原文

Prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are part of the sequential FLAMSA-reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen to cure high risk myeloid neoplasia with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Although DLI themselves carry significant risks, their prophylactic use has not been analyzed in a time-dependent manner.

One hundred and fourteen patients underwent FLAMSA-RIC HSCT between 2013 and 2020. Next to Kaplan-Meier estimation of overall, disease-free, and graft-versus-host relapse-free survival (OS, DFS, GRFS), cumulative incidences of relapse and death in remission were calculated in a competing risk model.

Additionally, the contribution of prophylactic and preemptive DLI as time-dependent covariates was assessed using a time-varying model toward DFS (Simon-Makuch method, Mantel-Byar test). At 2 years, OS was 45. 2% [95% CI 36. 7-55. 7%], DFS 31. 8% [95% CI 24-42. 2%] and GRFS 11. 3 [95% CI 6. 5-19. 8]. Neither prophylactic nor preemptive DLI showed a significant influence on DFS when considered time-dependent covariates (Mantel-Byar, p = .

3). This was further corroborated in competing risk analysis with DLI as time-dependent covariates. Both prophylactic and preemptive DLI miss significance in their impact on survival within a high-risk cohort in a time-varying model. Controlled trials to address the impact of postgrafting immunotherapy approaches are needed.

论文信息

作者
Weller JF、Mezger M、Seifert LL、Vogel W、Schneidawind D、Faul C、Bethge W、Lengerke C
单位
Medical Clinic, Department of Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.Germany
期刊
European journal of haematology2022 Mar
原文标识
PubMed 34902880 · DOI 10.1111/ejh.13732