← 返回

CARTITUDE-1 患者与德国注册登记中既往暴露于 PI、Imid 和抗 CD-38 的多发性骨髓瘤患者的校正结局比较

英文原题:Adjusted Comparison of Outcomes between Patients from CARTITUDE-1 versus Multiple Myeloma Patients with Prior Exposure to PI, Imid and Anti-CD-38 from a German Registry.

查看英文原题

Adjusted Comparison of Outcomes between Patients from CARTITUDE-1 versus Multiple Myeloma Patients with Prior Exposure to PI, Imid and Anti-CD-38 from a German Registry.

PubMed 2021/11/29(内容时间) Cancers (Basel) Q2 · IF 4.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

西达基奥仑赛(cilta-cel)是一种CAR-T 细胞疗法,有望使既往多线治疗的复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)患者实现长期疾病控制。由于cilta-cel在单臂CARTITUDE-1临床试验中评估,我们使用Therapie Monitor注册数据库中的外部患者队列;这些患者符合CARTITUDE-1入组标准。研究比较cilta-cel与真实世界常规临床治疗对总生存期(OS)和至下一线治疗时间(TTNT)的影响。利用患者个体数据,通过逆概率治疗加权法(IPW;接受治疗人群平均治疗效应[ATT]权重及重叠人群[ATO]权重)和多变量Cox比例风险回归调整两队列比较。

意向治疗人群中的比较结果为:IPW-ATT下TTNT风险比0.13(95%置信区间[CI] 0.07~0.24)、OS风险比0.14(95% CI 0.07~0.25);IPW-ATO下TTNT 0.24(95% CI 0.12~0.49)、OS 0.26(95% CI 0.13~0.54)。修正意向治疗人群中,IPW-ATT下TTNT风险比0.24(95% CI 0.09~0.67)、OS 0.26(95% CI 0.08~0.84);IPW-ATO下TTNT 0.26(95% CI 0.11~0.59)、OS 0.31(95% CI 0.12~0.79)。所有比较均具有统计学意义,且结果倾向cilta-cel。这些结果凸显cilta-cel作为新型有效疗法的潜力,可应对RRMM患者的未满足治疗需求。

展开英文摘要原文

Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy with the potential for long-term disease control in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). As cilta-cel was assessed in the single-arm CARTITUDE-1 clinical trial, we used an external cohort of patients from the Therapie Monitor registry fulfilling the CARTITUDE-1 inclusion criteria to evaluate the effectiveness of cilta-cel for overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) vs. real-world clinical practice. Individual patient data allowed us to adjust the comparisons between both cohorts, using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPW; average treatment effect in the treated population (ATT) and overlap population (ATO) weights) and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression.

Outcomes were compared in intention-to-treat (HR, IPW-ATT: TTNT: 0. 13 (95% CI: 0. 07, 0. 24); OS: 0. 14 (95% CI: 0. 07, 0. 25); IPW-ATO: TTNT: 0. 24 (95% CI: 0. 12, 0. 49); OS: 0. 26 (95% CI: 0. 13, 0. 54)) and modified intention-to-treat (HR, IPW-ATT: TTNT: 0. 24 (95% CI: 0. 09, 0. 67); OS: 0. 26 (95% CI: 0.

08, 0. 84); IPW-ATO: TTNT: 0. 26 (95% CI: 0. 11, 0. 59); OS: 0. 31 (95% CI: 0. 12, 0. 79)) populations. All the comparisons were statistically significant in favor of cilta-cel. These results highlight cilta-cel's potential as a novel, effective treatment to address unmet needs in patients with RRMM.

论文信息

作者
Merz M、Goldschmidt H、Hari P、Agha M、Diels J、Ghilotti F、Perualila NJ、Cabrieto J
第一作者单位
Cell Therapy and Hemostaseology, Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.Germany
通讯作者单位
Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY 10029, USA.United States
期刊
Cancers2021 Nov 29
原文标识
PubMed 34885106 · DOI 10.3390/cancers13235996