← 返回

Blinatumomab 无应答和高疾病负荷与 B-ALL 患者接受 CD19-CAR 后的较差结局相关

英文原题:Blinatumomab Nonresponse and High-Disease Burden Are Associated With Inferior Outcomes After CD19-CAR for B-ALL.

查看英文原题

Blinatumomab Nonresponse and High-Disease Burden Are Associated With Inferior Outcomes After CD19-CAR for B-ALL.

PubMed 2021/11/12(内容时间) J Clin Oncol Q1 · IF 44.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究思路按摘要原文分段

CD19靶向CAR-T 细胞(CD19-CAR)和blinatumomab可有效诱导复发/难治性B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的缓解,但也与CD19抗原调节相关。关于既往blinatumomab暴露对后续CD19-CAR结局影响的数据有限。

我们开展了一项多中心、回顾性研究,纳入2012年至2019年间接受CD19-CAR治疗的复发/难治性ALL儿童及年轻成人患者。主要目标为按blinatumomab使用情况分层的6个月无复发生存期(RFS)和无事件生存期(EFS)。次要目标包括比较长期生存结局、完全缓解率、CD19调节,以及识别与EFS相关的因素。

在420例接受商业化tisagenlecleucel或三种研究性CD19-CAR构建体之一治疗的患者中(中位年龄12.7岁;四分位距7.1-17.5),77例(18.3%)既往接受过blinatumomab。与未接受过blinatumomab的患者相比,接受过blinatumomab的患者更常携带KMT2A重排并接受过既往干细胞移植。在可评估CD19-CAR反应的患者中(n = 412),blinatumomab无应答者的CD19-CAR完全缓解率(31例中20例,64.5%)低于blinatumomab应答者(42例中39例,92.9%)或未接受过blinatumomab的患者(339例中317例,93.5%),P < .0001。CD19-CAR治疗后,blinatumomab无应答者的6个月EFS较差(27.3%;95% CI,13.6至43.0),相比blinatumomab应答者(66.9%;95% CI,50.6至78.9;P < .0001)或未接受过blinatumomab的患者(72.6%;95% CI,67.5至77;P < .0001),且RFS较差。高疾病负荷独立与较差的EFS相关。CD19-dim或部分表达(输注前)在接受过blinatumomab的患者中更常见(13.3% v 6.5%;P = .06),并与较低的EFS和RFS相关。

迄今为止在儿童CD19-CAR中最大规模的系列研究,并且据我们所知,是首个研究序贯CD19靶向影响的研究,我们证明blinatumomab无应答和高疾病负荷与较差的RFS和EFS独立相关,确定了CD19-CAR后长期结局的重要指标。

展开英文摘要原文

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CD19-CAR) and blinatumomab effectively induce remission in relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) but are also associated with CD19 antigen modulation. There are limited data regarding the impact of prior blinatumomab exposure on subsequent CD19-CAR outcomes.

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective review of children and young adults with relapsed or refractory ALL who received CD19-CAR between 2012 and 2019. Primary objectives addressed 6-month relapse-free survival (RFS) and event-free survival (EFS), stratified by blinatumomab use. Secondary objectives included comparison of longer-term survival outcomes, complete remission rates, CD19 modulation, and identification of factors associated with EFS.

Of 420 patients (median age, 12.7 years; interquartile range, 7.1-17.5) treated with commercial tisagenlecleucel or one of three investigational CD19-CAR constructs, 77 (18.3%) received prior blinatumomab. Blinatumomab-exposed patients more frequently harbored KMT2A rearrangements and underwent a prior stem-cell transplant than blinatumomab-naïve patients. Among patients evaluable for CD19-CAR response (n = 412), blinatumomab nonresponders had lower complete remission rates to CD19-CAR (20 of 31, 64.5%) than blinatumomab responders (39 of 42, 92.9%) or blinatumomab-naive patients (317 of 339, 93.5%), P < .0001. Following CD19-CAR, blinatumomab nonresponders had worse 6-month EFS (27.3%; 95% CI, 13.6 to 43.0) compared with blinatumomab responders (66.9%; 95% CI, 50.6 to 78.9; P < .0001) or blinatumomab-naïve patients (72.6%; 95% CI, 67.5 to 77; P < .0001) and worse RFS. High-disease burden independently associated with inferior EFS. CD19-dim or partial expression (preinfusion) was more frequently seen in blinatumomab-exposed patients (13.3% v 6.5%; P = .06) and associated with lower EFS and RFS.

With the largest series to date in pediatric CD19-CAR, and, to our knowledge, the first to study the impact of sequential CD19 targeting, we demonstrate that blinatumomab nonresponse and high-disease burden were independently associated with worse RFS and EFS, identifying important indicators of long-term outcomes following CD19-CAR.

论文信息

作者
Myers RM、Taraseviciute A、Steinberg SM、Lamble AJ、Sheppard J、Yates B、Kovach AE、Wood B
第一作者单位
Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.United States
通讯作者单位
National Cancer Institute/Center for Cancer Research, Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.United States
文献类型
多中心研究 · 美国 NIH 院内研究
期刊
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2022 Mar 20
原文标识
PubMed 34767461 · DOI 10.1200/JCO.21.01405