← 返回

桥接放疗联合抗 BCMA CAR-T 细胞疗法治疗多发性骨髓瘤的安全性

英文原题:The Safety of Bridging Radiation with Anti-BCMA CAR T-Cell Therapy for Multiple Myeloma.

查看英文原题

The Safety of Bridging Radiation with Anti-BCMA CAR T-Cell Therapy for Multiple Myeloma.

PubMed 2021/09/15(内容时间) Clin Cancer Res Q1 · IF 10.9(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

桥接放疗与 CART-BCMA 疗法在我们的 r/rMM 患者中显得安全且可行,尽管未来需要更大规模的研究来得出明确结论。

研究思路结论见上方概要

B细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)靶向嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞(CART-BCMA)是治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(r/rMM)的一种有前景的疗法。我们在CART-BCMA的I期试验中评估了桥接放疗(RT)在受试者中的安全性和可行性。

25例r/rMM受试者在三个队列中接受了两剂CART-BCMA细胞环磷酰胺治疗。我们根据RT接受情况回顾性分析了毒性、缓解和CAR-T 制备数据。

13例受试者在CAR-T 输注前<1年未接受RT(A组)。8例受试者在CAR-T 输注前<1年接受RT(B组),RT至单采的中位时间为114天(范围40-301)。4例受试者接受桥接RT(C组),中位剂量为22 Gy,RT至输注时间为25天(范围18-35)。C组4级(G4)血液学毒性发生率在数值上更低(25%),而A组为61.5%,B组为62.5%。G3-4神经毒性在A组、B组和C组中的发生率分别为7.7%、25%和25%。G3-4细胞因子释放综合征在A组、B组和C组中的发生率分别为38.5%、25%和25%。部分缓解或更好疗效在A组、B组和C组中分别观察到54%、38%和50%。单采前<1年(P = 0.002)和<100天(P = 0.069)接受RT与生产过程中体外扩增较低相关;然而,体内CART-BCMA扩增在各组之间似乎相似。

展开英文摘要原文

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells (CART-BCMA) are a promising treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (r/rMM). We evaluated the safety and feasibility of bridging radiation (RT) in subjects treated on a phase I trial of CART-BCMA. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-five r/rMM subjects were treated in three cohorts with two doses of CART-BCMA cells cyclophosphamide. We retrospectively analyzed toxicity, response, and CART manufacturing data based on RT receipt.

Thirteen subjects received no RT <1 year before CART infusion (Group A). Eight subjects received RT <1 year before CART infusion (Group B) with median time from RT to apheresis of 114 days (range 40-301). Four subjects received bridging-RT (Group C) with a median dose of 22 Gy and time from RT to infusion of 25 days (range 18-35). Group C had qualitatively lower rates of grade 4 (G4) hematologic toxicities (25%) versus A (61.5%) and B (62.5%). G3-4 neurotoxicity occurred in 7.7%, 25%, and 25% in Group A, B, and C, respectively. G3-4 cytokine release syndrome was observed in 38.5%, 25%, and 25% in Group A, B, and C, respectively. Partial response or better was observed in 54%, 38%, and 50% of Group A, B, and C, respectively. RT administered <1 year ( P = 0.002) and <100 days ( P = 0.069) before apheresis was associated with lower in vitro proliferation during manufacturing; however, in vivo CART-BCMA expansion appeared similar across groups.

Bridging-RT appeared safe and feasible with CART-BCMA therapy in our r/rMM patients, though larger future studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions.

论文信息

作者
Manjunath SH、Cohen AD、Lacey SF、Davis MM、Garfall AL、Melenhorst JJ、Maxwell R、Arscott WT
单位
Division of Radiation Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. shwetha.manjunath@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.United States
文献类型
I 期临床试验 · 美国 NIH 资助研究 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2021 Dec 1
原文标识
PubMed 34526365 · DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0308