← 返回

头颈癌全身治疗的现状

英文原题:Current status of systemic therapy in head and neck cancer.

查看英文原题

Current status of systemic therapy in head and neck cancer.

PubMed 2021/07/24(内容时间) J Chemother Q3 · IF 2.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

头颈癌(SCCHN)的管理存在若干争议。尽管综合治疗是局部晚期SCCHN(LA-SCCHN)的标准方案,但化疗的最佳时机一直存在争议。使用高剂量顺铂的化放疗(CRT)的毒性问题促使人们采用强度较低的方法。每周顺铂和靶向治疗已在随机试验中进行了探索。由于对总生存期缺乏影响,新辅助化疗在LA-SCCHN中的获益存在争议,然而,在印度背景下,由于许多患者因分期较晚和体能状态(PS)较差而不适合 upfront 手术或确定性CRT,它仍然是一个可行的选择。在转移性背景下,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICPi)数据的复杂性需要谨慎解读,直到确定其获益的理想生物标志物。其显著的成本以及口服节拍治疗的有前景数据使转移性SCCHN的治疗格局更加复杂。为了解决这些紧迫问题,我们对SCCHN全身治疗的证据进行了批判性综述。

展开英文摘要原文

There are several controversies in the management of head and neck cancer (SCCHN). Although combined modality treatment is standard in locally advanced SCCHN (LA-SCCHN), the optimal timing of chemotherapy has been debated. Toxicity concerns with chemoradiation (CRT) using high dose cisplatin have prompted use of less intensive approaches. Weekly cisplatin and targeted therapies have been explored in randomized trials.

Benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LA-SCCHN is debated due to lack of impact on overall survival, however, it remains a viable option in the Indian setting where many patients are not eligible for upfront surgery or definite CRT due to advanced stage and poor performance status (PS).

The complexity of data of immune check point inhibitors (ICPi) in metastatic setting needs cautious interpretation till an ideal biomarker for their benefit is identified. Their significant cost and promising data of oral metronomic therapy has made the treatment landscape of metastatic SCCHN even more complex. To address these burning issues, we did a critical review of evidence of systemic therapy in SCCHN.

论文信息

作者
Mittal A、Sharma A
单位
Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. BRAIRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.India
文献类型
综述
期刊
Journal of chemotherapy (Florence, Italy)2022 Feb
原文标识
PubMed 34308772 · DOI 10.1080/1120009X.2021.1955201