← 返回

黑色素瘤癌症治疗性疫苗比较的贝叶斯网络 meta 分析

英文原题:A Bayesian network meta-analysis of comparison of cancer therapeutic vaccines for melanoma.

查看英文原题

A Bayesian network meta-analysis of comparison of cancer therapeutic vaccines for melanoma.

PubMed 2021/06/29(内容时间) J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Q1 · IF 9.2(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

针对黑色素瘤的几种主动免疫治疗方法,包括肽基疫苗(PVs)、自体肿瘤细胞疫苗(TCVs)、同种异体TCVs和自体树突状细胞疫苗(DCVs),已在临床试验中进行了研究。

然而,比较这些干预措施的综合证据仍不可获得。本研究的目的是扩展先前的工作,通过贝叶斯网络meta分析,在总生存期和毒性效应方面比较和排序黑色素瘤的免疫治疗策略。在方法学上,我们进行了一项网络meta分析,纳入头对头随机对照试验,比较和排序黑色素瘤患者的癌症疫苗方法。检索了PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、WHO国际临床试验注册平台和ClinicalTrials.gov,截止日期为2020年7月31日。

我们估计了死亡的汇总风险比和毒性的风险比。通过meta回归检验了潜在预后变量对生存获益的影响。我们根据转移类别对结局进行了亚组分析。

总体而言,我们识别出4776条引文,其中15项头对头随机对照试验(3162名参与者)被纳入分析。在疗效方面,同种异体肿瘤细胞疫苗加免疫治疗佐剂、肽基疫苗加免疫治疗佐剂和标准治疗比肽疫苗更有效。女性比例与死亡风险呈负相关。在安全性方面,除同种异体肿瘤细胞疫苗加化疗外,所有治疗均劣于同种异体肿瘤细胞疫苗。肽疫苗联合免疫治疗佐剂相比异体肿瘤细胞疫苗联合免疫治疗佐剂导致不良事件风险增加。这些结果表明,异体TCV和自体DCV优于标准治疗。PV联合免疫调节剂在所有可比策略中最为有效,但与毒性增加相关。任何癌症治疗性疫苗的联合方案都需要在风险与获益特征之间取得平衡。

展开英文摘要原文

Several approaches to active immunotherapy for melanoma, including peptide-based vaccines (PVs), autologous tumour cell vaccines (TCVs), allogeneic TCVs and autologous dendritic cell vaccines (DCVs), have been investigated in clinical trials.

However, comprehensive evidence comparing these interventions remains unavailable. The objective of this study was to expand previous work to compare and rank the immunotherapeutic strategies for melanoma in terms of overall survival and toxic effects with a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Methodologically, we performed a network meta-analysis of head-to-head randomized controlled trials comparing and ranking cancer vaccine approaches for patients with melanoma. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials. gov were searched up to 31 July 2020.

We estimated summary hazard ratios for death and risk ratios for toxicity. The effects of the underlying prognostic variable on survival benefits were examined by meta-regression.

We performed subgroup analysis for the outcomes based on metastatic categories.

Overall, we identified 4776 citations, of which 15 head-to-head randomized controlled trials (3162 participants) were included in the analysis. In terms of efficacy, allogeneic tumour cell vaccines plus immunotherapy adjuvants, peptide-based vaccines plus immunotherapy adjuvants and standard therapy were more effective than peptide vaccines. The proportion of women was inversely associated with mortality risk. For safety, all treatments were inferior to allogeneic tumour cell vaccines except for allogeneic tumour cell vaccines plus chemotherapy.

Peptide vaccines plus immunotherapy adjuvants led to an increased risk of adverse events compared to allogeneic tumour cell vaccines plus immunotherapy adjuvants. These results suggest that allogeneic TCV and autologous DCV are better than standard therapy. PV plus immune modulators are the most effective strategy among all comparable strategies but is associated with increased toxicity. Any combination regimens for cancer therapeutic vaccines need to be balanced between risk and benefit profiles.

论文信息

作者
Lau P、Shen M、Ma F、Chen Y、Zhang J、Su J、Chen X、Liu H
单位
Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.China
文献类型
综述 · 网状荟萃分析
期刊
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2021 Oct
原文标识
PubMed 34077578 · DOI 10.1111/jdv.17437