← 返回

接受 CAR-T 细胞治疗的 CNS 淋巴瘤患者的中期认知结局

英文原题:Medium-Term Cognitive Outcome in Patients With CNS Lymphomas Treated With Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.

查看英文原题

Medium-Term Cognitive Outcome in Patients With CNS Lymphomas Treated With Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.

PubMed 2026/10/03(内容时间) Neurology Q1 · IF 8.9(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

接受CAR-T 细胞治疗的中枢神经系统淋巴瘤患者的中期神经认知随访结果似乎令人安心,未出现显著的认知恶化,甚至一般认知功能有所改善,即使在经历过严重急性神经毒性的患者中也是如此。这些结果尚需更长时间的随访加以证实。

研究思路结论见上方概要

嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞治疗在中枢神经系统淋巴瘤中已显示出令人鼓舞的疗效结果,且急性神经毒性的发生率令人安心。然而,这些脑损伤患者的神经系统结局在短期之后仍不清楚。我们的目的是报告中期神经认知演变。

我们回顾性选取了2021年6月至2024年4月在Pitié-Salpêtrière医院接受CAR-T 细胞治疗的孤立性CNS淋巴瘤患者,这些患者作为常规诊疗的一部分接受了神经心理学随访(采用多种测试评估主要认知域:语言、记忆、执行功能、视空间能力和整体功能)。我们从患者病历中收集了基线时、无肿瘤进展时、CAR-T 细胞治疗后6周(W6)、6个月(M6)和12个月(M12)时各项认知测试的结果。我们使用配对Student t检验比较神经认知变量随访值与基线值。主要结局是基线至M12之间蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)评分的差异。

共纳入30例患者(女性43%,男性57%),其中21例在M12前完成了神经心理学评估。中位年龄为61岁(范围30-82)。基线时,MoCA评分为23.5(范围11-29),34%-80%的患者在主要认知域存在评分异常。19例(63%)患者出现急性神经毒性(6例(20%)为≥3级)。21例(70%)患者在W6时MoCA评分维持或改善,而9例(30%)患者评分恶化。神经毒性的发生及严重程度与这2种初始轨迹类型显著相关(p = 0.003,95% CI 1.78-1,227.01)。与基线相比,M6时MoCA评分显著改善(平均24.7 vs 22.6,p = 0.002,95% CI 0.92-3.37),M12时亦显著改善(平均25.4 vs 22.1,p < 0.001,95% CI 2.12-4.92)。语言评分在基线与M12之间显著改善(平均Z评分-0.6 vs -0.1;p = 0.02,95% CI 0.08-0.9)。评估记忆、执行功能、视空间功能以及焦虑/抑郁的评分保持稳定或改善,但未达统计学显著性。

展开英文摘要原文

We retrospectively selected isolated CNS lymphomas treated with CAR T cells (June 2021-April 2024) at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital who had neuropsychological follow-up as part of routine care (various tests evaluating main cognitive domains: language, memory, executive functions, visuospatial abilities, and overall functioning). We collected the results of the various cognitive tests from the patients' medical records at baseline, in the absence of tumoral progression; 6 weeks (W6); 6 months (M6); and 12 months (M12) after CAR T-cell therapy. We used paired Student t tests to compare follow-up values of neurocognitive variables with their baseline values. The primary outcome was the difference in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores between baseline and M12.

Thirty patients (43% female, 57% male) were included, of whom 21 had neuropsychological assessment up to M12. Their median age was 61 years (range 30-82). At baseline, MoCA score was 23.5 (range 11-29) and 34%-80% of patients had abnormal scores in the main cognitive domains. Nineteen (63%) patients experienced acute neurotoxicity (6 (20%) of grade ≥3). Twenty-one patients (70%) maintained or improved their MoCA score at W6, while 9 (30%) worsened theirs. The occurrence and severity of neurotoxicity were significantly associated with these 2 types of initial trajectories ( p = 0.003, 95% CI 1.78-1,227.01). There was a significant improvement of MoCA score at M6 (mean 24.7 vs 22.6, p = 0.002, 95% CI 0.92-3.37) and M12 (mean 25.4 vs 22.1, p < 0.001, 95% CI 2.12-4.92) compared with baseline. Language score significantly improved between baseline and M12 (mean Z -score of -0.6 vs -0.1; p = 0.02, 95% CI 0.08-0.9). Scores addressing memory, executive functions, visuo-spatial functions, and anxiety/depression were stable or improved, although not significantly. DISCUSSION: Midterm neurocognition follow-up in patients with CNS lymphoma treated by CAR T cells seems reassuring, with no significant cognitive worsening, and even an improvement in general cognitive functioning, even in patients who experienced severe acute neurotoxicity. These results should be confirmed with longer follow-up.

论文信息

作者
Mersali S、Chapelle R、Ribeiro M、Weiss N、Psimaras D、Le Guennec L、Birzu C、Hoang-Xuan K
单位
Service de Neurooncologie, Groupe Hospitalier Piti&#xe9;-Salp&#xea;tri&#xe8;re, APHP, Sorbonne Universit&#xe9;, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, ICM, IHU, Paris, France.Germany
期刊
Neurology2026 Oct 27
原文标识
PubMed 42826379 · DOI 10.1212/WNL.0000000000218561

READING GUIDES

相关资料阅读指南

了解这条资料涉及的技术、疾病或试验登记信息,再回到原始来源核实。