← 返回

德国弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤 CAR-T 疗法与自体干细胞移植的成本与利用比较分析:来自法定医疗保险账单和全国住院数据的洞见

英文原题:Comparative Cost and Utilization Analysis of CAR-T Therapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Germany: Insights from Statutory Health Insurance Billing and Nationwide Inpatient Data.

查看英文原题

Comparative Cost and Utilization Analysis of CAR-T Therapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Germany: Insights from Statutory Health Insurance Billing and Nationwide Inpatient Data.

PubMed 2026/09/30(内容时间) J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Q2 · IF 3.3(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

尽管与更高的IR成本相关,CAR-T 治疗在DLBCL中相比autoSCT显示出更低的住院和FR成本。

研究思路结论见上方概要

嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法已改变弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的治疗格局,但其药物采购成本高于自体干细胞移植(autoSCT),而给药和随访成本在经济评价与报销决策中仍被低估。本研究从德国法定健康保险(SHI)视角,比较CAR-T 与autoSCT用于DLBCL的给药相关成本及后续治疗成本。

基于两个德国数据库进行了两步分析。在第一步中,对2020-2022年的SHI账单数据(代表500万参保人,≙ 8%的SHI)进行了纵向分析。成本分为初始方案(IR)(除CAR-T 药物采购外的所有服务)和后续方案(FR)。在第二步中,对2020-2023年所有德国住院病例(每年1700万例)进行了横断面分析,以评估住院成本。

第1步纳入12例CAR-T 和59例autoSCT患者。每例患者的中位IR成本为€61,703(CAR-T)对€55,802(autoSCT),而CAR-T 的FR成本较低(€44,832对€69,453)。CAR-T 对autoSCT最常报告的不良事件(任何级别)为:B细胞发育不全/中性粒细胞减少症(77%对64%)、血小板减少症(38%对64%)。第2步纳入1,229例CAR-T 和2,239例autoSCT住院病例(2020-2023年)。平均LOS相当(27.3对27.8天),CAR-T 的平均住院成本较低(€13,991对€29,432)。

展开英文摘要原文

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) but carries higher drug acquisition costs than autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT), while administration and follow-up costs remain underrepresented in economic evaluations and reimbursement decision-making. This study compares administration-related and subsequent treatment costs of CAR-T and autoSCT for DLBCL from the German statutory health insurance (SHI) perspective.

A two-step analysis based on two German databases was performed. In step 1, SHI billing data (representing 5 million insured individuals, ≙ 8% of SHI) from 2020-2022 were analyzed longitudinally. Costs were divided into initial regime (IR) (all services except CAR-T drug acquisition) and a following regime (FR). In step 2, a cross-sectional analysis of all German inpatient cases from 2020-2023 (17 million cases/year) assessed inpatient costs.

Step 1 included 12 CAR-T and 59 autoSCT patients. Median IR costs per patient were €61,703 (CAR-T) versus €55,802 (autoSCT), while FR costs were lower for CAR-T (€44,832 versus €69,453). Most frequently reported adverse events (any grade) for CAR-T versus autoSCT were: B-cell aplasia/neutropenia (77% versus 64%), thrombocytopenia (38% versus 64%). Step 2 included 1,229 CAR-T and 2,239 autoSCT inpatient cases (2020-2023). Average LOS was comparable (27.3 versus 27.8 days), and average inpatient costs were lower for CAR-T (€13,991 versus €29,432).

Although associated with higher IR costs, CAR-T therapy in DLBCL demonstrated lower inpatient and FR costs compared to autoSCT. This analysis focused on administration and follow-up costs, excluding drug acquisition costs, characterizing the economic burden beyond drug pricing.

论文信息

作者
Froitzheim AC、Kurte MS、Gehrke K、Lempfert S、Hesse K、Kron F
第一作者单位
Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.Germany
通讯作者单位
VITIS Healthcare Group, Cologne, Germany. f.kron@vitis-healthcare.com.Germany
文献类型
对照研究
期刊
Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology2026 Sep 30
原文标识
PubMed 42823558 · DOI 10.1007/s00432-026-06628-0

READING GUIDES

相关资料阅读指南

了解这条资料涉及的技术、疾病或试验登记信息,再回到原始来源核实。