CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Geographic Variation and Inequities in Burden and Access to CAR T-Cell Therapies for Multiple Myeloma in the US.
Geographic Variation and Inequities in Burden and Access to CAR T-Cell Therapies for Multiple Myeloma in the US.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CAR-T 可及性存在显著的地理和社会经济差异,较长的驾车时间、较低的家庭收入和非都市居住地限制了其使用,凸显了有针对性地扩展 ATC 的必要性。
嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法为复发和/或难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)提供了显著的生存获益。然而,在美国各地其可及性仍然有限。我们研究了MM疾病负担的地理差异以及CAR-T 可及性差异的关键驱动因素,以为制定有针对性的策略来弥合这些差距提供依据。
2021年1月至2024年8月期间,从Komodo患者层面分析与洞察衍生索赔数据库中识别出MM患者和CAR-T 接受者。ZIP-3级别的MM患病率来自美国癌症统计数据库。计算了MM患者到最近授权治疗中心(ATC)以及CAR-T 接受者到ATC的行车时间,并在全国和区域层面进行了比较。
研究期间共有106,593例现患患者。南部地区的MM负担位居第二(66.1/100,000人),但位于ATC 1小时车程内的患者比例最低(55.7%)。南部地区CAR-T 接受者前往ATC的行程也最长(中位数,1.5小时)。纳入社会经济和人口学协变量的多变量分析表明,前往最近ATC的潜在驾车时间为2小时 versus < 1小时(调整比值比[or] = 0.43;95%置信区间(CI),0.27-0.69)、家庭收入 < $50k versus $100k(or = 0.19;95% CI,0.05-0.69),以及居住在非大都市地区 versus 大都市地区(or = 0.41;95% CI,0.28-0.60)与CAR-T 使用几率降低显著相关。
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies offer substantial survival benefits for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, access remains limited across the US. We examined geographic variation in MM burden and key drivers of CAR T access disparities to inform targeted strategies to close these gaps.
Patients with MM and CAR T recipients from January 2021-August 2024 were identified from the Komodo Patient-Level Analytics and Insights Derivative claims database. MM prevalence at the ZIP-3 level came from the US Cancer Statistics database. Drive-times to the nearest authorized treatment center (ATC) for patients with MM and to ATCs for CAR T recipients were calculated and compared nationally and by region.
There were 106,593 prevalent patients over the study period. The South had the second highest MM burden (66.1/100,000 people) but the lowest proportion of patients within 1 hour of an ATC (55.7%). CAR T recipients in the South also traveled the longest to their ATC (median, 1.5 hours). Multivariable analysis with socio-economic and demographic covariates indicated that 2 hour potential drive-time to nearest ATC versus < 1 hour (adjusted odds ratio [or] = 0.43; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.27-0.69), household income < $50k versus $100k (or = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.69), and residence in nonmetropolitan areas versus metropolitan (or = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.60) were significantly associated with reduced odds of CAR T use.
There were substantial geographic and socioeconomic disparities in CAR T access, with long drive times, lower household income, and non metro residence limiting uptake and underscoring the need for targeted ATC expansion.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。