← 返回

CD19 CAR-T 治疗失败后的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤:更新的真实世界结局、预后因素和预测模型

英文原题:Large B-Cell Lymphoma after CD19 CAR-T Failure: Updated Real-World Outcomes, Prognostic Factors, and Prediction Models.

查看英文原题

Large B-Cell Lymphoma after CD19 CAR-T Failure: Updated Real-World Outcomes, Prognostic Factors, and Prediction Models.

PubMed 2026/08/06(内容时间) Transplant Cell Ther Q1 · IF 4.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者在接受靶向CD19的CAR-T 细胞治疗失败后的结局仍然很差,用于指导后续管理的预后工具有限。

我们评估了CAR-T 失败后的真实世界结局,并开发了用于预测后续抗肿瘤治疗后生存的临床预测模型(CPM)。我们开展了一项单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入2016年至2024年间在Oregon Health & Science University接受靶向CD19的CAR-T 治疗的成年LBCL患者。纳入CAR-T 治疗后出现复发或进展的患者。评估了自复发/进展起的总体生存期(OS1)以及自开始后续抗肿瘤治疗起的总体生存期(OS2)。采用Cox比例风险模型开发用于预测接受后续治疗患者1年OS的CPM。在187例接受靶向CD19的CAR-T 治疗的患者中,100例(53%)出现治疗失败。68例患者接受了后续抗肿瘤治疗,并被纳入预后分析。

中位OS1为5.07个月(95% CI,3.71至8.58)。与未接受进一步治疗的患者相比,接受后续治疗的患者OS显著改善(中位OS1,9.94个月对0.74个月;P < .001)。在接受治疗的患者中,中位OS2为8.34个月(95% CI,6.73至20.1),不同治疗策略组或治疗时代之间无显著差异。表现最佳的CPM纳入了从CAR-T 输注至后续治疗的时间、乳酸脱氢酶水平和美国东部肿瘤协作组体能状态,在内部验证后显示出良好的区分度(c统计量,0.771)和校准度。尽管有多种挽救治疗策略可用,LBCL 患者 CAR-T 治疗失败后的结局仍然很差。CAR-T 治疗后至复发时间是最强的预后因素。所提出的 CPMs 可为风险分层提供实用框架,并支持临床决策和临床试验选择,尚待外部验证。

展开英文摘要原文

Outcomes after CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy failure in relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) remain poor, and prognostic tools to guide subsequent management are limited.

We evaluated real-world outcomes after CAR-T failure and developed clinical prediction models (CPMs) for survival after subsequent anti-cancer therapy.

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of adult patients with LBCL treated with CD19-directed CAR-T therapy at Oregon Health & Science University between 2016 and 2024. Patients experiencing relapse or progression after CAR-T therapy were included.

Overall survival from relapse/progression (OS1) and from initiation of subsequent anti-cancer therapy (OS2) were evaluated. Cox proportional hazards models were used to develop CPMs for 1-yr OS among patients receiving subsequent therapy. Among 187 patients treated with CD19-directed CAR-T therapy, 100 (53%) experienced treatment failure. Sixty-eight patients received subsequent anti-cancer therapy and were included in prognostic analyses. Median OS1 was 5. 07 mo (95% CI, 3. 71 to 8. 58). Patients receiving subsequent therapy had significantly improved OS compared with those who did not receive further treatment (median OS1, 9. 94 versus 0. 74 mo; P < . 001). Among treated patients, median OS2 was 8. 34 mo (95% CI, 6.

73 to 20. 1), with no significant differences across treatment strategy groups or treatment eras. The best-performing CPM incorporated time from CAR-T infusion to subsequent therapy, lactate dehydrogenase level, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, demonstrating good discrimination (c-statistic, 0. 771) and calibration after internal validation.

Outcomes after CAR-T failure in LBCL remain poor despite the availability of multiple salvage treatment strategies. Time to relapse after CAR-T therapy was the strongest prognostic factor. The proposed CPMs may provide a practical framework for risk stratification and support clinical decision-making and clinical trial selection pending external validation.

论文信息

作者
Kungwankiattichai S、Bastola S、Rai M、Chen AI、Desai A、Tan A、Owattanapanich W、Maziarz RT
第一作者单位
Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health &amp; Science University, Portland, Oregon; Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.Thailand
通讯作者单位
Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health &amp; Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: maziarzr@ohsu.edu.
期刊
Transplantation and cellular therapy2026 Aug 6
原文标识
PubMed 42562324 · DOI 10.1016/j.jtct.2026.07.038