← 返回

肿瘤基因组生物标志物作为侵袭性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤 CD19 CAR-T 细胞治疗后结局的预后修饰因素:系统综述与探索性荟萃分析

英文原题:Tumor Genomic Biomarkers as Prognostic Modifiers of Outcomes Following CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Aggressive Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis.

查看英文原题

Tumor Genomic Biomarkers as Prognostic Modifiers of Outcomes Following CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Aggressive Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis.

PubMed 2026/06/30(内容时间) Genes (Basel) Q2 · IF 3.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase和Web of Science/BIOSIS(2026年4月),并在全文获取阶段进行了针对性的PubMed引文查找(PROSPERO CRD420261350514)。符合条件的研究纳入了接受符合方案要求的CD19 CAR-T 细胞治疗的R/R疾病成人患者,并报告了预设的肿瘤基因组生物标志物及分层结局。当至少有三项可比且不重叠的研究提供可提取数据时,拟合采用限制性最大似然估计并施加Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman(HKSJ)校正的随机效应模型。

去重后,共筛选182条记录,对37条进行资格评估,26项研究纳入定性综合;其中10项研究的数据用于4项合并分析。DHL/THL阳性疾病与较差的未校正总生存期(OS)相关(风险比[HR] 1.52;95%置信区间[CI],1.21-1.89;95%预测区间(PI),0.56-4.08),而非生发中心B细胞样(GCB)/ABC COO则与较差的校正后无进展生存期(PFS)相关(HR 1.44;95% CI,1.04-2.00;95% PI,0.86-2.43)。TP53改变(OR 1.30; 95% CI, 0.01-156.60)和COO(OR 1.27; 95% CI, 0.24-6.61)的完全缓解分析在统计学上不具参考价值。没有研究能够对复杂核型进行评估。

CD19 CAR-T 细胞治疗后按生物标志物分层的证据稀少且报告不一致。DHL/THL状态和非GCB/活化B细胞样(ABC)COO显示出探索性生存信号,而TP53和COO的完全缓解分析则不具参考价值。这些生物标志物仍属假设生成性质,而非经验证的CAR-T 细胞治疗结局预测因子,需要开展标准化、前瞻性的生物标志物分层报告。

展开英文摘要原文

Background/Objectives : Outcomes after CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (aLBCL) remain heterogeneous. Tumor genomic biomarkers, such as TP53 alteration, MYC/BCL2/BCL6 rearrangement-defined double-hit or triple-hit lymphoma (DHL/THL), cell of origin (COO), and complex karyotype, are established or candidate prognostic factors in conventionally treated lymphoma, but their relevance after CAR T-cell therapy is uncertain.

We conducted a systematic review with exploratory meta-analysis of biomarker-stratified outcomes after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in aLBCL. Methods : We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science/BIOSIS (April 2026), with targeted PubMed citation lookup during full-text retrieval (PROSPERO CRD420261350514). Eligible studies enrolled adults with R/R disease treated with protocol-eligible CD19 CAR T-cell therapy and reported prespecified tumor genomic biomarkers with stratified outcomes. Random-effects models, using restricted maximum-likelihood estimation with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) adjustment, were fitted when at least three comparable, non-overlapping studies provided extractable data. Results : After duplicate removal, 182 records were screened, 37 were assessed for eligibility, and 26 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis; 10 contributed to 4 pooled analyses. DHL/THL-positive disease was associated with worse unadjusted overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.

52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1. 21-1. 89; 95% prediction interval (PI), 0. 56-4. 08), and non-Germinal center B-cell-like (GCB)/ABC COO with worse adjusted progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1. 44; 95% CI, 1. 04-2. 00; 95% PI, 0. 86-2. 43). The complete-response analyses for TP53 alteration (OR 1. 30; 95% CI, 0. 01-156. 60) and COO (OR 1. 27; 95% CI, 0. 24-6. 61) were statistically uninformative. No study permitted evaluation of complex karyotypes.

Conclusions : Biomarker-stratified evidence after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy is sparse and inconsistently reported. DHL/THL status and non-GCB/activated B-cell-like (ABC) COO showed exploratory survival signals, whereas the TP53 and COO complete-response analyses were uninformative. These biomarkers remain hypothesis-generating rather than validated predictors of CAR T-cell outcome, and standardized, prospective biomarker-stratified reporting is needed.

论文信息

作者
Yang J、Hatcher H、Kulkarni H、Learn CA
单位
Parexel International, LLC., Raleigh, NC 27609, USA.United States
文献类型
系统综述 · 荟萃分析
期刊
Genes2026 Jun 30
原文标识
PubMed 42510792 · DOI 10.3390/genes17070752